- Search Forex Factory
- 61 Results (4 Threads , 57 Replies )
- vx13 replied Apr 27, 2011
Thanks! It's working out great :]
- vx13 replied Apr 25, 2011
I've seen this before, actually xD So I thought I'd save you some time You'll find it here: url It's a variant of solar wind and there's repainting and non-repainting versions
- Can I get some help from MA/Envelope experts? Pretty please
After practicing VSA for a few months now (and loving it), I've been giving into the temptation of ...
- vx13 replied Jan 19, 2011
I understand that one standard deviation away from the mean covers 68% of the data of a normal distribution curve so one deviation up is 34% and one down is 34% but where is the mean in this test? Is it at the mean of every bar or PoC or a moving ...
- vx13 replied Jan 12, 2011
Agreed. But what I was taking from the quote was that a stop should not be arbitrary in relation to significant price levels. It shouldn't be placed just because it's "20 pips from my entry". Placing it by the criteria of money management, giving ...
- vx13 replied Jan 11, 2011
You really are the man! Thing is, I woke up this morning remembering some interesting thing from a thread I started a while back. Let me share this single post with you by 7bit. url Below are the two pictures from the post. The first chart shows ...
- vx13 replied Jan 6, 2011
I have only read the first few posts but, newyear, you are a god-sent. This is a thread I've always wanted to exist and you are a brilliant man for doing so. I will continue to read the rest and look forward to more posts.
- vx13 replied Dec 12, 2010
Why do that? url
- vx13 replied Dec 12, 2010
Two things: No one's replied Not to fret I mean I'm asking for a favor. A handout. And there really never is any free lunch. Maybe I'll just twist it. I realized that since all the probabilities add to one, then the divisor of ...
- Help Request - Consecutive Candle Script Modification
Hey there, I'm seeking assistance in rewriting this script. It should be quick but after reading a ...
- vx13 replied Dec 1, 2010
I agree. Whether you like his stuff or not, at least he's teaching something. If it isn't beneficial to you, ignore it. If it is, listen up. The rest means nothing. I for one am ears open.
- vx13 replied Nov 30, 2010
Newyear, you'll want to get real familiar with this. url I checked and it looks like it's not udner his profile anymore but luckily I have it bookmarked. Trader V and CrucialPoint, I want to thank both of you again. I've just gone over the thread ...
- vx13 replied Nov 30, 2010
Sorry Newyear. I promise I put the best effort I could but the Parrondo paradox is just not working out. I haven't replied in a while because I've gone recluse just to figure it out and nothing. Don't get me wrong, if smjones did pull it off, I'm ...
- vx13 replied Nov 29, 2010
I definiltey agree. The thread I'm currently working with is using a fairly unique idea as the basis of the topic. It's interesting whether it will work or not.
- vx13 replied Nov 29, 2010
This the greatest thread on this site hands down, bar none. As for my idea, it comes from an old book I read. The name escapes me. Here it goes: "If you had purchased $1,000 of Delta Air Lines stock one year ago, you would have $49 left. ...
- vx13 replied Nov 28, 2010
Post #100 — Marv, I'm going to be honest with you. I have no freakin' clue in the entire world xD I was raised on television. I was programmed to believe that mystical, cryptic-speaking, wise figures were ones you should look to to learn. ...
- vx13 replied Nov 27, 2010
Yes as has been mentioned by Intu in reference to rangebound's post. 1.) That's why I believe B1 and B2 work as I think they do. I may be completely off base, I'm sure but I think B1 has certain expectations in a certain market and B2 has the same. ...
- vx13 replied Nov 27, 2010
For Spearion, he responds to rangebound in the sequential post. Looks like win rates only affect the step curve and not the equity itself. They are separated. If we were using equity directly in the model, of course you would only use B2. It's got a ...
- vx13 replied Nov 27, 2010
In game two, there's two subgames. You are spot on. B1 has a high positive expectancy and B2 has a low negative expectancy. But the thing is, there's no rule that says B1 can't be the low expectancy and B2 has the high expectancy. I look at it like ...
- vx13 replied Nov 27, 2010
Anyone miss me? — I'm back. Haven't posted in a bit but I have been checking in on this thread here and again. I went to do a bit of solo research with the light guided along the way by Eurotrash, John1, smjones, and Spearion whether they know ...