Althea Photoshoot 26054S Althea Photoshoot 26054S Althea Photoshoot 26054S

FOMC preview: the Fed might be on hold, but easing is inevitable.

Bonds
Picture of Althea Spinozzi
Althea Spinozzi

Head of Fixed Income Strategy

Summary:  A slightly more hawkish message at this week’s FOMC meeting is possible as voting Federal Reserve bank presidents rotate. A forceful Fed coupled with an increase in US Treasury coupon issuance will likely result in higher long-term yields. Yet, disinflationary trends, the end of the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) in March, and an increase in US Treasury coupon issuance are accommodating for upcoming less aggressive monetary policies. We expect a tapering of Quantitative Tightening to precede interest rate cuts. However, a review of the Fed economic projections in March might enable the central bank to bring both onto the table. That builds the case for a bond rally and bull-steepening of the yield curve in the year's first half. Yet, the real test will come in the second half of 2024, as inflation might remain elevated, resulting in the Fed lagging markets' rate cut expectations.


More hawks than doves.

This week's FOMC meeting will see a rotation of voting Fed bank presidents. Chicago Fed's Goolsbee (dove), Philadelphia Fed's Harker (centrist), Dallas Fed's Logan (centrist), and Minneapolis Fed's Kashkari (hawk) will not vote in 2024. In their place, Cleveland Fed’s Mester (hawk), Richmond Fed’s Barkin (hawk), Atlanta Fed’s Bostic (hawk), and San Francisco's Daly (hawk) become voting members this year.

It is, therefore, safe to assume that the FOMC will be tilting hawkish at this meeting, especially when the new voting members have clarified their views before the blackout period. Loretta Mester recently said that a rate cut is “probably” too early in March, and Lorie Logan said that easing financing conditions put rate hikes back onto the table. More moderate are the views of Mary Daly and Raphael Bostic, who said that the economy and policy were balanced and that rate cuts might start earlier.

A stalling Fed coupled with an increase in US Treasury notes and bonds issuance means that we might be up for a bear-steepening of the yield curve, with 10-year yields rising towards 4.25%.

29_01_2024_AS1
Source: Bloomberg.

Yet, policymakers face tight financial conditions, with real rates remaining among the highest since the global financing crisis at 1.85%. As inflation continues to descend, the Fed runs the risk of tightening monetary policy further by just not doing anything, posing a threat to real growth in the coming quarters. That’s why, in December, the Federal Reserve signaled that rates have peaked and that cuts will start this year. The question is what inflation level will give the green light for the Federal Reserve to begin cutting rates.

While core CPI remains at 3.9% YoY, almost double the Fed’s 2% inflation target, the core PCE index dropped below 3% YoY for the first time in December. Regardless of the measure the Federal Reserve decides to look at, it will need to see clear disinflationary trends before engaging in easier monetary policies, making any signals to start cutting rates as soon as March is premature.

Tapering Quantitative Tightening (QT) is likely to precede rate cuts.

From the December Fed's economic projections, we know that the central bank expects real growth to fall to 1.4% in 2024, unemployment to rise to 4.1%, and headline and core inflation to fall to 2.4% this year and hit the Fed’s 2% target only in 2026. Such forecasts bode well with the December dot plot, which shows the Federal Reserve is in no rush to cut rates.

However, the picture becomes complete when considering Quantitative Tightening (QT). Economists estimate that QT was a substitute for roughly two interest rate hikes last year. If the Fed tapers the monthly amount running off from the Fed Balance sheet, a slower QT could serve as implicit rate cuts, adding to those already indicated by the dot plot.

Although we are not expecting any official announcement regarding QT this week, we do not exclude that the Fed might open to the idea that the runoff of its balance sheet is likely to decelerate. The central bank has already confirmed the end of the Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) on the 11th of March and might be planning to slow down QT to ease financing conditions.

Remember that this quarter, the US Treasury is expected to increase borrowings further. Throughout the last part of 2023, the Treasury increased T-Bills sizes, which were easily absorbed by money market funds (MMF). Therefore, the Fed’s Reverse Repurchase facility (RRP) dropped to $570 billion from more than $2 trillion in the first half of 2023. If the Treasury continues to increase T-Bills issuance size, it will also start to drain reserves. Bank reserves at the Fed currently amount to $3.5 trillion, leaving some buffer to increase T-Bills supply, but not much. According to an August 2023 paper published by the St. Louis Fed, reserves are considered to be ample, around 10% to 12% of the nominal GDP, corresponding to around $2.7 trillion to $3 trillion bank reserves, as per the end of 2023.

As announced by the US Treasury in November, coupon issuance will need to increase this quarter. If QT is not slowed down anytime soon, there is a risk that upward pressure will be applied in the long part of the yield curve, causing financing conditions to tighten further.

That’s why we expect the Fed to tweak QT early and before cutting rates. The March FOMC meeting presents the perfect opportunity to do that together with a new set of economic projections.

What does that mean for bonds?

For bonds, it will come down to where inflation will stabilize in the future and at what level the Federal Reserve will stop cutting rates.

Bond futures expect the Fed to cut rates at every meeting until September 2025, with rates bottoming at 3.5%. The 10-year US Treasury has historically offered a pickup of roughly 100bps over the Fed fund rate, implying 10-year US Treasury yields of 4.5%. Yet, the Fed dot plot shows a long-term neutral rate of 2.5%. The long-term rate of inflation will dictate where rates will stabilize in the future, making the long part of the yield curve volatile and likely to trade in wide ranges in the near term.

That doesn't mean that yields can't go lower in the meantime as disinflationary trends continue and the Federal Reserve declares victory over inflation, preparing to ease the economy.

Even if this week’s FOMC meeting happens to be hawkish or a non-event, the path for a bond rally is set in the first half of the year. The real test will come later in the year, as inflation might stabilize above the Fed's inflation target or even rebound, and the Fed might be lagging markets' rate cut expectations.

 

Disclaimer

The Saxo Bank Group entities each provide execution-only service and access to Analysis permitting a person to view and/or use content available on or via the website. This content is not intended to and does not change or expand on the execution-only service. Such access and use are at all times subject to (i) The Terms of Use; (ii) Full Disclaimer; (iii) The Risk Warning; (iv) the Rules of Engagement and (v) Notices applying to Saxo News & Research and/or its content in addition (where relevant) to the terms governing the use of hyperlinks on the website of a member of the Saxo Bank Group by which access to Saxo News & Research is gained. Such content is therefore provided as no more than information. In particular no advice is intended to be provided or to be relied on as provided nor endorsed by any Saxo Bank Group entity; nor is it to be construed as solicitation or an incentive provided to subscribe for or sell or purchase any financial instrument. All trading or investments you make must be pursuant to your own unprompted and informed self-directed decision. As such no Saxo Bank Group entity will have or be liable for any losses that you may sustain as a result of any investment decision made in reliance on information which is available on Saxo News & Research or as a result of the use of the Saxo News & Research. Orders given and trades effected are deemed intended to be given or effected for the account of the customer with the Saxo Bank Group entity operating in the jurisdiction in which the customer resides and/or with whom the customer opened and maintains his/her trading account. Saxo News & Research does not contain (and should not be construed as containing) financial, investment, tax or trading advice or advice of any sort offered, recommended or endorsed by Saxo Bank Group and should not be construed as a record of our trading prices, or as an offer, incentive or solicitation for the subscription, sale or purchase in any financial instrument. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, would be considered as a marketing communication under relevant laws.

Please read our disclaimers:
Notification on Non-Independent Investment Research (https://www.home.saxo/legal/niird/notification)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/disclaimer/saxo-disclaimer)
Full disclaimer (https://www.home.saxo/legal/saxoselect-disclaimer/disclaimer)

Saxo Bank A/S (Headquarters)
Philip Heymans Alle 15
2900
Hellerup
Denmark

Contact Saxo

Select region

International
International

Trade responsibly
All trading carries risk. Read more. To help you understand the risks involved we have put together a series of Key Information Documents (KIDs) highlighting the risks and rewards related to each product. Read more

This website can be accessed worldwide however the information on the website is related to Saxo Bank A/S and is not specific to any entity of Saxo Bank Group. All clients will directly engage with Saxo Bank A/S and all client agreements will be entered into with Saxo Bank A/S and thus governed by Danish Law.

Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc, registered in the US and other countries and regions. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Google Play and the Google Play logo are trademarks of Google LLC.