Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Britain’s international trade minister, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, at talks in the US.
Britain’s international trade minister, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, at the talks in the US. Photograph: Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images
Britain’s international trade minister, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, at the talks in the US. Photograph: Roberto Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images

Britain and US agree on steel tariffs as hopes of broader trade deal recede

This article is more than 2 years old

Pact ends months of tensions but talks on full free-trade agreement remain far off

The UK has struck a deal with the US to remove tariffs on British steel exports, although trade experts warned a broader trade deal between the two countries remains far off.

The agreement was struck after UK’s international trade minister, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, met her counterpart, the US commerce secretary, Gina Raimondo, on Tuesday evening in Washington.

The deal ended months of tensions that have stood in the way of a broader bilateral trade agreement, but US trade representative Katherine Tai also dealt a blow to the hopes of the UK government, which wants to secure a broad free trade agreement (FTA) as a sign of success in its Brexit policy.

Speaking after meeting Trevelyan separately in Baltimore, Maryland, Tai described FTAs as “a very 20th-century” tool and it might not be worth “blood sweat and tears” to agree. “I just want to say we are finding in trade that one size does not fit all,” Tai said, according to Politico.

Experts said the US was unlikely to start trade negotiations until at least November after midterm elections, and it would use talks to forcefully assert foreign policy priorities.

The US-UK steel deal included a provision requiring Chinese-controlled companies in the UK to be audited annually to ensure they were not breaching restrictions on Chinese steel exports. In practice, the main target of the provision will be British Steel, owned by China’s Jingye.

David Henig, the UK director of the European Centre for International Political Economy, a thinktank, said the China provision suggested UK negotiators would face a tricky balancing act if broader talks were opened.

“The UK government is keen to sign up to things, but it could be quite dangerous things they sign up to,” he said. “[The US is] going to drive a very hard bargain on things like China.”

In a joint statement, Raimondo and Tai said the deal would allow the allies to focus on what they described as “China’s unfair trade practices”.

“It points to the direction of travel we’re heading in,” said Sam Lowe, the director of trade at Flint Global, a consultancy. “I suspect we’re going to see more of this type of thing to ensure countries play by the rules – or the rules as the US sees them.”

Nevertheless, the steel deal does remove a recurrent sticking point between the two countries. British steel and aluminium companies that export to the US have faced tariffs of 25% and 10% respectively on their goods since 2018, when they were brought in by the then president Donald Trump. The UK retaliated with equivalent levies on prominent American products such as Levi’s jeans, bourbon whiskey and Harley Davidson motorbikes.

The US section 232 tariffs were introduced under “national security” concerns and were part of Trump’s broader efforts to put pressure on trading partners.

The UK steel industry reacted with alarm when the US agreed a deal with the EU to remove the Trump-era tariffs on European steel at the end of 2021, leaving British businesses at a disadvantage for months.

Sign up to the daily Business Today email or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

The pact will also end Britain’s retaliatory tariffs on American goods, including Harley-Davidson motorcycles, bourbon whiskey, Levi Strauss blue jeans, and cigarettes.

Alasdair McDiarmid, operations director for the steelworkers’ union Community, welcomed the agreement, adding: “To protect jobs our steelmakers must compete on a level playing field, and it is vital the UK does not suffer a further competitive disadvantage with EU producers.

“The EU secured their deal with the US back in October, so a UK-US deal is well overdue, and it must be implemented without delay to prevent further damage to our industry.”

Most viewed

Most viewed