- #27,444
- Jan 31, 2016 9:14pm Jan 31, 2016 9:14pm
wow! this place has turned into "ghost thread" (like ghost town), yoohooo anyone in here???
ok just trying to give back this thread what I took, karma you know.
so after the dumping, @ bars 1 & 2 we see the high of bar (dumping) being tested.
after the support being rejected we have a 2BR followed by an upthrust (antonym for shakeout) with massive volume & next bar down.
is that demand on bar 3 coz its on the support, what's going on here?
The bar following bar 3 looks like a test, will the support hold? doesn't look like as we have two no-demands here (bar no.4 & the one before it). with all the weakness in the background a no-demand becomes all the more potent.
Bar 5 is all that was needed here & it is confirmed too. BANG!
Last night I watched The Conjuring (2013) & The Exorcist (1973) back to back, I was told they are the scariest movies. I wasn't disappointed, but honestly at no point I was scared. Annabelle (2014) is on the cards, I don't think it'll offer anything more, lets see.
ok just trying to give back this thread what I took, karma you know.
so after the dumping, @ bars 1 & 2 we see the high of bar (dumping) being tested.
after the support being rejected we have a 2BR followed by an upthrust (antonym for shakeout) with massive volume & next bar down.
is that demand on bar 3 coz its on the support, what's going on here?
The bar following bar 3 looks like a test, will the support hold? doesn't look like as we have two no-demands here (bar no.4 & the one before it). with all the weakness in the background a no-demand becomes all the more potent.
Bar 5 is all that was needed here & it is confirmed too. BANG!
Last night I watched The Conjuring (2013) & The Exorcist (1973) back to back, I was told they are the scariest movies. I wasn't disappointed, but honestly at no point I was scared. Annabelle (2014) is on the cards, I don't think it'll offer anything more, lets see.
The loss was not bad luck. It was bad Analysis - D.Einhorn
- #27,445
- Feb 1, 2016 9:03am Feb 1, 2016 9:03am
- Joined Aug 2009 | Status: Reading the TAPE | 2,389 Posts
Without VSA, you're playing checkers while the Smart Money plays chess.
Today's trade:
- #27,447
- Feb 2, 2016 12:38am Feb 2, 2016 12:38am
{quote} Bar 3 looks like a test bar to me. It's a high volume test bar that fails.
Thanks HG
Now this is where the plot thickens, don't you think it is strange that bar 3 closed so well off the low when it should of closed a bit lower mebbe below the mid point?
The loss was not bad luck. It was bad Analysis - D.Einhorn
- #27,451
- Edited 11:55am Feb 4, 2016 11:43am | Edited 11:55am
- Joined Sep 2010 | Status: I'm not here... or am I? | 4,000 Posts
Today's zone = Tomorrow's opportunity!
- #27,452
- Feb 4, 2016 11:53am Feb 4, 2016 11:53am
Thanks pres78 for the answer. I will search through for Hull MA. Regarding the brokers could you name some? I mean that was the main question on what you guys are using, what broker gives reliable tick volume data to trade VSA. It doesn't have to be a broker to trade with, just demo for volume
- #27,454
- Feb 11, 2016 3:23am Feb 11, 2016 3:23am
hey hi everyone!
ok, in the below chart what we have is a raging downtrend, we have a no-demand (red) & there's ample weakness behind it, the 3 bars behind it have all closed way off the low, demand coming in & as a result market was knocked sideways (albeit for a brief period before it continued on its way down)
But this is all in hind sight, in real time when that no-demand appeared & it got confirmed was it a good idea to enter short here keeping in mind those three devils with long tails?
is the volume on that no-demand still quite high?
ok, in the below chart what we have is a raging downtrend, we have a no-demand (red) & there's ample weakness behind it, the 3 bars behind it have all closed way off the low, demand coming in & as a result market was knocked sideways (albeit for a brief period before it continued on its way down)
But this is all in hind sight, in real time when that no-demand appeared & it got confirmed was it a good idea to enter short here keeping in mind those three devils with long tails?
is the volume on that no-demand still quite high?
The loss was not bad luck. It was bad Analysis - D.Einhorn
- #27,455
- Feb 12, 2016 12:40am Feb 12, 2016 12:40am
hey hi everyone!
http://c2n.me/3udfLXd
- #27,456
- Feb 12, 2016 7:05am Feb 12, 2016 7:05am
Thanks pete, your arrows do make sense 
here's the 30min chart, everything was so easy, no wonder it's my favourite
anyway, does anyone else thinks the volume on that ND(15m) was too high?
here's the 30min chart, everything was so easy, no wonder it's my favourite
anyway, does anyone else thinks the volume on that ND(15m) was too high?
The loss was not bad luck. It was bad Analysis - D.Einhorn
- #27,459
- Feb 23, 2016 12:41pm Feb 23, 2016 12:41pm
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2015 | 1,243 Posts
