Higher Edge within a Single Candlestick | Page 76 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

An Edge for an Edge (System Development) 116 replies

Beating the Odds - Edge Within a Single Candlestick (Explained) 71 replies

Looking for higher timeframe candlestick overlay indicator 10 replies

top 2 single candlestick pattern 7 replies

There is No Edge in a Single Candlestick 64 replies

Attachments: Higher Edge within a Single Candlestick
Exit Attachments

Higher Edge within a Single Candlestick

  • #1,501
  • Oct 11, 2017 10:56am Oct 11, 2017 10:56am
Quoting MaxenshteinD
{quote} Your star is wrong. But I can teach you just for 200$ how to draw them correctly on past history. Forget about price action. The new trend is Star Action. A small hint - the star must have 6 edges.
Some people see it as a star, some people see it as something else or something else in it
  • #1,502
  • Oct 11, 2017 10:58am Oct 11, 2017 10:58am
Quoting rapidscalper
{quote} CP, are you a vegan ? curious question "So I am living without fats, without meat, without fish, but am feeling quite well this way. It always seems to me that man was not born to be a carnivore." "I have always eaten animal flesh with a somewhat guilty conscience." - Albert Einstein Archive 60-058

Einstein is a genius but humans are not carnivores.... so he like anybody else also commits mistakes this is one of them... and biologically and scientifically living without fats is impossible. just saying...
  • #1,503
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:01am Oct 11, 2017 11:01am
Quoting tradeforlife
{quote} Some people see it as a star, some people see it as something else or something else in it
It's the Illuminati pyramid and the all seeing eye, that is the center of the start that's it I cracked the system... I'll teach you in the next episode of vegan Einstein and the demi crap talking god, series...

lolol omg I think I also need a pad
  • #1,504
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:10am Oct 11, 2017 11:10am
Zwara, please stop my face hurts!!
  • #1,505
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:15am Oct 11, 2017 11:15am
Quoting zwara
{quote} It's the Illuminati pyramid and the all seeing eye, that is the center of the start that's it I cracked the system... I'll teach you in the next episode of vegan Einstein and the demi crap talking god, series... lolol omg I think I also need a pad
i dont beliebe you, you will disappear after you told us all the truth and let us followers alone to think about this gems of informations, until you come back.
  • #1,506
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:16am Oct 11, 2017 11:16am
Quoting kprsa
Buying above the line -> useful in Las Vegas
what are the odds?
cheers,
k

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 390F823E-1D25-4632-A56B-1F3F53F8909C.png Size: 2.9 MB
  • #1,507
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:20am Oct 11, 2017 11:20am
Quoting dukas_trader
{quote} i dont beliebe you, you will disappeare after you tell us all the truth and let us followers alone to think about this gems of informations, until you come back.

Nah I will disappear without telling the secret I will only tell I cracked it.... and It's proven I am millionaire I just logged in my account looked into the all seeing eye and spoke with Einstein and his demi god crap friend ( this last one seemed a bit lost with the clouds and the phases of the sun, but he will get it in season II) and now I Know it all I own the star and the pyramid, so all I need is followers... come on sheep gather I have the secret for this shit ....

lol...

Cheers guys enough of laughs for today... let them arrive and unleash crappy hell upon us
  • #1,508
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:26am Oct 11, 2017 11:26am
Quoting skyway
{quote} Cracked which one ? The line, star or single candlestick ?
i hope at least he will present very usefull statistics, at least that 100% of all stars have at least one edge. with this 100% its near impossible to lose.
  • #1,509
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:44am Oct 11, 2017 11:44am
Quoting nealpek
I want to thank all of you for the best laugh I have had in a long time,especially Max, Zwara, Skyway and the rest.... You guys killed me!! Wow, I still have tears in my eyes!!!
I also like having fun, but have you ever heard more statistically proven concepts such as cp's statement about 95% of the time price moving above/below the open ?
The truth is hidden from you
  • #1,510
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:46am Oct 11, 2017 11:46am
Anyway:
In total I played about ten games today. The probability of the first event (also, my personal record, seems that my trend following abilities outperform my extra sensory ones) is 0.2%, the second about 3%. The chances of getting both in such a small number of games is miniscule (I did get under average result twice, 4 and 5, though). The strategy is simple, go with the card which shows the greatest number of hits so far. The strategy by itself singles out any card which statistically dominates.
In Fx the analogy would be going with the strongest performing instrument over a certain period of time. On average, say during a year, while it is possible that all the instruments return to equilibrium, it is also highly unlikely. This type of strategy would ensure more wins than losses (ignoring trading costs and other subtleties).
All the best.
k
  • #1,511
  • Oct 11, 2017 11:55am Oct 11, 2017 11:55am
Quoting MaxenshteinD
{quote} I also like having fun, but have you ever heard more statistically proven concept such as cp's statement about 95% of the time price moving above/below the open ?
any backtest of trading strategies (manuell or automatic) is nothing more then a statistically proven concept of the trading system, at least when you do it correct.
this "95% of the time price moving above/below the open" is near nothing, its like 1/100 part of a trading system, and even dont have to be a good one. its only a simple fact without telling you anything for your next trade, because you dont know the direction. useless statistics are often puplished, but they dont are usefull only by puplishing. you can then always say "you have to find out" and "think more about", "there is a gem in it"..... but people who really trade speak a little bit different about this basic statistic with not really important impact.
  • #1,512
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:06pm Oct 11, 2017 12:06pm
Quoting nealpek
{quote} As a quantum theory probabilistic mathematically inclined statistician, I would have to increase that number to 99.99% of the time price will close above or below the open with a 100% confidence level 95% of the time, 86% of which must be ignored because 95% of the time the standard deviation above the 90% confidence level is only relevant 94% of the time when the standard error is in the 90th percentile 85% of the time. So trade accordingly.....
to have correct numbers you even would need to put all trading costs inside (spread, commission) and have split results then for many currencies. so this results of 95% will not be very correct.
and this percentages are basic stuff for statistical stimulated people, but it will not tell a lot, alone this number will even till nothing.
  • #1,513
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:08pm Oct 11, 2017 12:08pm
“If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself.”
― Albert Einstein
  • #1,514
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:14pm Oct 11, 2017 12:14pm
Try not to become a

man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.

albert einstein.
  • #1,515
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:21pm Oct 11, 2017 12:21pm
Quoting nealpek
dukas, I was just making a joke!!! What's funnier than this is CP has 487 subscribers. I'm speechless!!!
thats normal in forums, many cant see the truth. its like a church, many here tell all the time "there is a gem inside his words", they dont know where and dont know why, ignore the misleading mistakes,....... you can judge by your own at what level most of this people are.

but this will never stop, you only need to write what you look like and not who you are, and you will be the most loved man. saying nothing with near many words is best to do in this case, and this can cp perfect, telling total basics in other words and people cant see it. ofcourse people learned from this basics, thats why this are basics exactly.if he is telling advanced things he fails often in do it correct, but people cant see again. do on the end tell all the people you will leave (best do it like cp once every week), and finished is your church of forex.
  • #1,516
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:25pm Oct 11, 2017 12:25pm
Exactly
  • #1,517
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:28pm Oct 11, 2017 12:28pm
Let me put it for in the simplest way I know. "A shit salesman with a mouthful of samples". Is that what your implying???
  • #1,518
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:55pm Oct 11, 2017 12:55pm
Quoting Sossos
Let me put it for in the simplest way I know. "A shit salesman with a mouthful of samples". Is that what your implying???

A shit salesman with a mouthful of samples = cheap talker.

on spot.
  • #1,519
  • Oct 11, 2017 12:57pm Oct 11, 2017 12:57pm
Quoting zwara
{quote} A shit salesman with a mouthful of samples = cheap talker. on spot.

ohhh I can't wait I'll be so doomed (I'm an infidel) when the dark legion lord AKA cheap talker releases his minions against me...

Ps I won't die alone Neal and Dukas will die with me, gather brother we are going to heaven so study the moon cycles and the trident stars of the markets, and we will crack CP secret the art of trading in the bullshit zone...
  • #1,520
  • Edited 1:16pm Oct 11, 2017 1:04pm | Edited 1:16pm
Quoting Sossos
Let me put it for in the simplest way I know. "A shit salesman with a mouthful of samples". Is that what your implying???
i dont know who he is.
i can only judge what he writes. he looks like a complete other person then he tried to show here.
in very basic things he is ok, in advanced things he has extrem problems and often is total misleading and wrong. its difficult to judge, looks like he is not without a reason always speaking about total basics (only written in extrem difficult words with most parts without any content to trading). so he cant be wrong to often and enough people who look and look for a "gem inside many often unimportant words".

so anyone needs to judge for their own.
for me he looks more funny then with informations, but he has so hard wrong things told, so its normal that he looks funny often. impossible to avoid.
but i can understand, that people who cant see his bigger mistakes will not find him funny,and find his basics as informations, and because written different then normal basics done, he looks smarter to some people. but of course that he is not in any kind and had he proven very often.
1 trader viewing now