Disliked{quote} I did see this, but I thought you were kidding. But you repeated it. So you must believe it. It makes no sense, but then again, nothing that has been said about the single controlling algo has made any sense. Let me get this straight: you've detected an error in the algo, whereby large banks can drop funds on the opposite side of their order book (opposite side of the order book, meaning what?) (and without this programming error, the banks would have to do what exactly to drop funds there?)(and the banks benefit from this activity how exactly?...Ignored
I can't see another reason why large orders turn the market so easily. It only takes 10 minutes of average daily volume to turn a market, pull backs takes 3 minutes worth of average volume. That major low on GBPUSD a few hours back only took 11 minutes worth of average volume. That's Fuck all.
I don't think you see the market as I do, a market starved of liquidity that's easily turned by using only moderate volume to create an inbalance on the order books. This inbalance or the amount needed to turn the market is well known by the major players. Even I know which is surprising because I don't claim to be the cleverest dick on these forums.
Trading thin liquidity at the boundary of the charts