• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 7:08pm
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 7:08pm
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Buy Stop Limit and Sell Stop Limit Orders on MT4 5 replies

Difference between stop-orders and limit-orders 9 replies

Auto SL/TP & buy limit, sell limit/buy stop, sell stop EA/indi 2 replies

Difference between buy limit, sell limit, buy stop, & sell stop? 4 replies

Stop orders instead of limit orders 0 replies

  • Trading Discussion
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 2
Attachments: Limit vs Stop Orders
Exit Attachments
Tags: Limit vs Stop Orders
Cancel

Limit vs Stop Orders

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 Page 23 4
  • 1 Page 23 4
  •  
  • Post #21
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:04am May 21, 2008 12:04am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
Is/was that true?? ...wow. That's amazingly restrictive.

So in a fast moving market you're saying you have to cross you fingers that the spread doesn't widen at the moment you place your (forced to use) "buy at market" order?? ...

On the ASX I'm sure you can place Limit orders over the offer. It's been a while since I bought or sold shares directly, though I'm 99% sure.

If Amazon is $81 and I want to buy right now, I'd much rather place a limit order at $82 than a Buy @ Market . Any higher and it's not worth my interest. Buy - Limit @ $82.
Ignored
It was always a stupid rule, and the NYSE even knows it's a stupid rule because they came up with a totally different order type called "Or Better" which CAN be placed on the wrong side. Now in reality, an "Or Better" order on the NYSE is just the same thing as a limit order, but it just has a different name. That's regulators for you...the original regulation was flawed, so instead of removing it they created a second regulation, thus confusing generations of Series-7 students.
 
 
  • Post #22
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:08am May 21, 2008 12:08am
  •  benssol
  • Joined Jan 2007 | Status: Member | 1,407 Posts
Answer: D

?

 
 
  • Post #23
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:10am May 21, 2008 12:10am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
H. Stay glued to the screen and place a limit order when the condition is met.

....or Stop - Limit @ 94.50

That get's down to what Merlin is pointing at though. A Stop - Limit is just a conditional/automated instruction to Place a Limit Order after a certain level is reached.
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #24
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:11am May 21, 2008 12:11am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
Is/was that true?? ...wow. That's amazingly restrictive.

So in a fast moving market you're saying you have to cross you fingers that the spread doesn't widen at the moment you place your (forced to use) "buy at market" order?? ...

On the ASX I'm sure you can place Limit orders over the offer. It's been a while since I bought or sold shares directly, though I'm 99% sure.

If Amazon is $81 and I want to buy right now, I'd much rather place a limit order at $82 than a Buy @ Market . Any higher and it's not worth my interest. Buy - Limit @ $82.
Ignored
To be fair to the NYSE a little though, there aren't very many "fast moving" stocks there. The NYSE has all the one to three letter symbols, meaning the oldest, most established, stable, stodgiest stocks. So it wasn't a big issue. Put in a market order for IBM when it's at 81 and you'll get 81 or maybe 81.03 or something.
 
 
  • Post #25
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:12am May 21, 2008 12:12am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting benssol
Disliked
Answer: D

?

Ignored

Half credit.
 
 
  • Post #26
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:13am May 21, 2008 12:13am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
It was always a stupid rule, and the NYSE even knows it's a stupid rule because they came up with a totally different order type called "Or Better" which CAN be placed on the wrong side. Now in reality, an "Or Better" order on the NYSE is just the same thing as a limit order, but it just has a different name. That's regulators for you...the original regulation was flawed, so instead of removing it they created a second regulation, thus confusing generations of Series-7 students.
Ignored
The same entity that stubbornly kept the up-tick rule for so long.
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #27
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:15am May 21, 2008 12:15am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
H. Stay glued to the screen and place a limit order when the condition is met.

....or Stop - Limit @ 94.50

That get's down to what Merlin is pointing at though. A Stop - Limit is just a conditional/automated instruction to Place a Limit Order after a certain level is reached.
Ignored

The customer is now yelling their head off at you. Here's why.

They specified that if IBM reached 94.5 that they wanted to BE SURE OF A FILL. Remember that a stop-limit, when triggered would turn into a limit order. So when the price reached the trigger of 94.50, the order turned into a limit order to buy at 94.50. This means that we are NOT allowed to buy at any price higher than that.

So now what happens if the next tic is 94.51? The order won't fill. Price is too high. Next the price goes to 94.75. Then 95. Then 98. Then 134!!!!!! LOL. Boy is this customer pissed that you told him to place a stop-limit order. He's watching a great missed opportunity pass him by while he's sitting on the sidelines.
 
 
  • Post #28
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:16am May 21, 2008 12:16am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
Half credit.
Ignored
I know you wanted F. but you complicated the answers on purpose didn't you?
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #29
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:17am May 21, 2008 12:17am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
The same entity that stubbornly kept the up-tick rule for so long.
Ignored
See, I don't even keep up. The uptick rule is gone? Cool.
 
 
  • Post #30
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:20am May 21, 2008 12:20am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
The customer is now yelling their head off at you. Here's why.
Ignored
Actually, I was referring to my wanting to have a limit if it was my own order. lol

As a broker acting on someones behalf , of course I'd go with D. (or F. lol)
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #31
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:20am May 21, 2008 12:20am
  •  benssol
  • Joined Jan 2007 | Status: Member | 1,407 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
Half credit.
Ignored
whaat


by the way, my buy stop now activated in GBPCHF
 
 
  • Post #32
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:23am May 21, 2008 12:23am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
See, I don't even keep up. The uptick rule is gone? Cool.
Ignored
Obviously I don't trade NYSE, but I'm sure sure it was removed not long back.
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #33
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:27am May 21, 2008 12:27am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
I know you wanted F. but you complicated the answers on purpose didn't you?
Ignored

LOL, yes it's F. But I put "C" in there to illustrate that neither a market order nor a limit order would work in that situation. So those can't be the only fundamental order types.

Remember the most basic conceptual difference between stops and limits is that stop orders are trend following orders and limit orders are contrarian type orders, just as Syafi meant in the original post.

Here's yet another way to illustrate the difference (same concept, different illustration of it).

Suppose IBM is at 90, and that there are a bunch of limit orders to buy at 88. There are also a bunch of limit orders to sell at 92. What will happen if IBM goes down to 88? It will hit a bunch of buy orders and turn back up. If IBM goes up to 92, it will hit a bunch of sell orders and turn back down. So LIMIT orders tend to create support and resistance levels. They turn the price back the other way...away from its trend.

Now consider the exact same situation, IBM at 90. But this time there is a cluster of STOP orders to buy at 92 (breakout players). There are also a bunch of STOP orders to sell at 88 (people put their stop losses there for instance). Now what will happen if IBM goes down to 88? All the sell stops will be triggered and there will be even more selling pressure, driving the price even lower. If IBM goes up to 92 instead, the buy stops will be hit driving the price even higher. So STOP orders tend to create even more momentum. They tend to keep the trend going in its original direction.

Again, these two order types are the exact opposites of each other.
 
 
  • Post #34
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:31am May 21, 2008 12:31am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting benssol
Disliked
whaat


by the way, my buy stop now activated in GBPCHF
Ignored

LOL, F doggone it. F includes C which includes my dig on the bearded one!
 
 
  • Post #35
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:37am May 21, 2008 12:37am
  •  benssol
  • Joined Jan 2007 | Status: Member | 1,407 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
LOL, F doggone it. F includes C which includes my dig on the bearded one!
Ignored
yes I read your previous post

you know how to discuss what you want to say in plain English

thanks for the discussion

now say this to Merlin

 
 
  • Post #36
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:37am May 21, 2008 12:37am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting benssol
Disliked
whaat


by the way, my buy stop now activated in GBPCHF
Ignored
Hmmm, let's see.

SL o BS
BL e SS

So... Buy stops are above the market. So without even looking at a chart, I can assume that GBP/CHF is moving up right now?
 
 
  • Post #37
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:39am May 21, 2008 12:39am
  •  benssol
  • Joined Jan 2007 | Status: Member | 1,407 Posts
Quoting capitalist88
Disliked
Hmmm, let's see.

SL o BS
BL e SS

So... Buy stops are above the market. So without even looking at a chart, I can assume that GBP/CHF is moving up right now?
Ignored
yes it was until you said this
 
 
  • Post #38
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:40am May 21, 2008 12:40am
  •  bundyraider
  • Joined Feb 2006 | Status: 'Try-hard' extraordinaire... | 2,151 Posts
I completely understand the need to have these different order types defined, and supported officially. For legal reasons, there needs to be a clear understanding of what terminology should be used between broker and client.

You're going to have a hard time arguing against the magic man though. ...he's right too. Those other defined order types are still just conditional derivatives of the basic "at market" or "Limit" order types.

You both win.

And for you...
The Uptick Rule: Nice Knowing You

.
Bundy's status today: "Waiting..."
 
 
  • Post #39
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:41am May 21, 2008 12:41am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting benssol
Disliked
yes it was until you said this
Ignored

Sorry dude!!! I hate when I accidentally move the market.
 
 
  • Post #40
  • Quote
  • May 21, 2008 12:47am May 21, 2008 12:47am
  •  capitalist88
  • Joined Oct 2006 | Status: Member | 1,070 Posts
Quoting bundyraider
Disliked
I completely understand the need to have these different order types defined, and supported officially. For legal reasons, there needs to be a clear understanding of what terminology should be used between broker and client.

You're going to have a hard time arguing against the magic man though. ...he's right too. Those other defined order types are still just conditional derivatives of the basic "at market" or "Limit" order types.

You both win.

And for you...
The Uptick Rule: Nice Knowing You

.
Ignored

He IS right. But we're both using the exact same definitions of the order types. So we agree on that. Where I think The Great Fuzzy Faced One and I don't see eye to eye is on how to "classify" the order types.

He sees market and limit to be fundamental, probably because the idea of an immediate sure fill at an uncertain price (market order) vs. a later possible fill at a price certain (limit order) is an important distinction for him.

To me the important distinction is the intent of the trader (bandwagon buying vs. bargain hunting; profit taking vs. panic selling), the actual effect of placing the orders (stop orders will fill immediately in situations where limit orders won't and vice-versa), and the effect on the market dynamic (creation of support/resistance vs. creation of more momentum in the same direction).

You can look at it both ways, depending on what you think is the more important distinction.
 
 
  • Trading Discussion
  • /
  • Limit vs Stop Orders
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 Page 23 4
    • 1 Page 23 4
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023