Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Help to debug my EA 2 replies

Developer Needed To Debug my EA 2 replies

MT4 EA coder required to fine-tune/debug existing EA 0 replies

Debug code in strategy tester 1 reply

debug message MT4 EA in Strategy Test 7 replies

Attachments: Help Needed to Debug Existing EA with proven strategy
Exit Attachments

Help Needed to Debug Existing EA with proven strategy

Quoting nihilist23uk
{quote} Its your set file just look back at post and you can see I just changed trading times.
Ah ok, because with the recent changes of the ea, i can't have stable or acceptable results.

What setting do you put for start hour and end hour, please ?


Thanks !
It's a pity that this has died, for someone who trades manually having the use of an ea would make a change as I'm not getting any younger the problem I have is I can understand a principle but when it comes to applying settings on an ea it becomes confusing.
But hey ho.....it looked good anyway.
just report. this is my test on v2. running on my vps about 1 month
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: rm v2.jpg Size: 594 KB
Quoting jamco388
just report. this is my test on v2. running on my vps about 1 month {image}
Can you please share your set file of parameters?
Is it on EJ only?
Quoting Philip Lee
I am sure most of you will agree with me if the above could be implemented, we would have exploited the strength of BOTH the Non-Hybrid and Hybrid modes and would have definitely eliminated the dead lock situation. The only disadvantage is that some cycles would hit the SL and we must accept losses once in a while. But I am sure most of you would agree with me that if we had started the cycle with all 3 time frames agreeing on the general trend, it would most probably than not that the cycle would end-up/close in profit. The advantages are as follows:...
I hope if you start a new thread , a new passionate coder will come to assist in implementing your improvement ideas. I have been addicted to reading your clear worded explanations and clarity. good luck
Quoting manuel
{quote} Can you please share your set file of parameters? Is it on EJ only?
read old post please.
Swing man, Phillip lee, if your looking in, how much trouble would it be to reverse the strategy, BUY=Sell, SELL=Buy, trust me, been on this all day, it may not be in line with your development Phillip, but in the interests of R&D, best regards D, ForexRMEA_4.2.
I don't need to be good at the game, only good enough to beat my opponent,
Hi.
I can help with coding.
According Philip Lee:
"the EA must then (after first trade opens) issue TWO pending orders (Sell Stops for the Seller EA and Buy Stops for the Buyer EA) with definable depth (distance in pips between the First Order and the first pending order), lot size & SL. "

Can someone please explain why no parallel pending orders placed at any of existing EA's (Tic-Tac's or Swingman's) on both directions when using Hybrid mode? or only one direction in Non-Hybrid mode?

For example, if sub depth=20:
EA opens a BUY trade at 100.00
2 Pending BUY Orders should be 20 pips above @ 100.20 and 40 pips above @ 100.40
and also if hybrid
2 Pending SELL Orders should be 20 pips below @ 99.80 and 40 pips below @ 99.60.

Right or I miss something?
Quoting jamco388
{quote} read old post please.
If I have followed what you have posted I have run this EUR/JPY H1 and EUR/USD H1

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurjpyH1.PNG Size: 50 KB
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusdH1.PNG Size: 49 KB


I'm going to try this on other popular pairs using the same dates.
Quoting geaves
{quote} If I have followed what you have posted I have run this EUR/JPY H1 and EUR/USD H1 {image}{image} I'm going to try this on other popular pairs using the same dates.
do forward test, don't trust backtest. i have lot collection great on backtest EA but blow your account on forward test
i have a reason why choose only EU.
My set only for EU
Quoting smilee89
According Philip Lee: "the EA must then (after first trade opens) issue TWO pending orders (Sell Stops for the Seller EA and Buy Stops for the Buyer EA) with definable depth (distance in pips between the First Order and the first pending order), lot size & SL. " Can someone please explain why no parallel pending orders placed at any of existing EA's (Tic-Tac's or Swingman's) on both directions when using Hybrid mode? or only one direction in Non-Hybrid mode? For example, if sub depth=20: EA opens a BUY trade at 100.00 2 Pending BUY Orders should...
That is the way I understand it. I think If you look at swingmans version 5.1 and use the back tester visual mode you should see that it places pendings and then removes them at the correct point.
I also think it would be great to get some fresh eyes to look over how its functioning with regards to the original hybrid mode. Swingmans versions function differently from one another and im unable to see why. But 5.1 def performs better than the rest so might be the best starting point.

Im really pleased your taking the time to look at this,im happy to help with any testing.
Quoting jamco388
just report. this is my test on v2. running on my vps about 1 month {image}
update: Already double account. deposit $500. This is my last update for this version guys.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: U123ntitled.jpg Size: 549 KB
Quoting jamco388
{quote} update: Already double account. deposit $500. This is my last update for this version guys. {image}
How is your account with the EA? You can show the latest results
Quoting fosser
{quote} How is your account with the EA? You can show the latest results
already $1.200
Quoting jamco388
{quote} already $1.200
Hi Jamco good job- whats the worst drawdown you have encountered ?
Hello jamco388, do you mind sharing your settings? I was experimenting with the inputs, but cannot find the sweet spot like you have. If you double your acct. that is great for you. I would like that kind of result also. I have tried so many EAs, but this one looks good and stable. I would like to test more with your settings before I put on live acct.
Quoting jamco388
Forex RM V2 01-01-2018 - 8-4-2018 {image}
Does this version Forex RM V2 by Tictacnur work now? Is it with an expiry? It doesn't work in my system.
Please advice
Quoting jamco388
{quote} already $1.200
Hi Jamco have spent weeks trying to duplicate your settings and I just cannot seem to get anywhere near your results, could you please post a screen shot of your settings, as others have said it is hard to copy off a report a screenshot of the settings would be very helpful, kind regards M
Quoting Philip Lee
Hi Nihilist23uk, First of all, I must agree with you that this EA (from Tic-tac-nur's V2.2 onwards to Swingman's V6.1) has HUGE POTENTIAL. This cannot be denied due to the simple fact that the underlining strategy is VERY SOUND. When I first started this thread, I know that I may not even get a proper working EA at the end of the day as we are 100% reliant on coders to deliver the EA for us, having absolutely zero ability to code myself. That is the risk that we have to take by sharing our ideas here. I do not expect much in return as I know the...
I m interested...

And 2day I feel like 200%
Attached Image
Vucking good EA coder...
#14 Return This Year: 83.4%
0 traders viewing now