I wonder who will have the honour of being the number 6000 post? *Oh that would be me
Take 1 step forward, two small steps back
- Post #6,002
- Quote
- Mar 2, 2017 5:22pm Mar 2, 2017 5:22pm
Dale, is that AudUsd swing trade still active?
I wonder who will have the honour of being the number 6000 post? *Oh that would be me
Reading coffee grounds..
- Post #6,003
- Quote
- Mar 2, 2017 5:29pm Mar 2, 2017 5:29pm
Let me be the 6000 and 1 to Congratulate You 
Edit: Bump... Fail
Edit: Bump... Fail
- Post #6,004
- Quote
- Mar 2, 2017 6:38pm Mar 2, 2017 6:38pm
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Sep 2016 | 1,511 Posts
- Post #6,005
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 12:37am Mar 3, 2017 12:37am
- Joined Sep 2016 | Status: Member | 622 Posts
- Post #6,006
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 2:20am Mar 3, 2017 2:20am
- Joined Nov 2015 | Status: I'm hungry | 4,033 Posts
- Post #6,008
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 3:41am Mar 3, 2017 3:41am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Sep 2016 | 1,511 Posts
Hello guys,
no new levels now. We will have to wait
Those wishing for a bit of education have a look at my TradingView profile (https://www.tradingview.com/u/Trader_Dale/#published-charts) there are all my levels with a brief commentary.
no new levels now. We will have to wait
Those wishing for a bit of education have a look at my TradingView profile (https://www.tradingview.com/u/Trader_Dale/#published-charts) there are all my levels with a brief commentary.
- Post #6,010
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 4:48am Mar 3, 2017 4:48am
{quote} I would delete the audchf, not because it was tested sooner but because there has formed a strong level close to this one (around 7532). eurgbp probably tested - because of monster reaction
connecting on st1's topic of the AUDUSD swing, I would like to follow-up (maybe because not much is happening,... today). Don't want to be boring and repeating myself here, but I had a question regarding this swing already a few days ago (as I was wondering whether it was tested or not). In your response you outlined it may be best to
- stock to it
- reduce the position size for the original level of 0.7595
- add if trade is going against you at 0.7565
Actually I did not take at 0.7595, wanted to wait for the 0.7565 level. Which is where we are now! So I wanted to enter a swing, but just saw your reply to st1 and the word "risky", which causes sometimes a certain reaction on my side 
. Long story short: do you consider it still promising, are you in?
thanks and best regards
- Post #6,013
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 8:03am Mar 3, 2017 8:03am
EU missed by 0.2 pip. But I took it at 1.05644 with half lot size and it hit TP. Dale´s levels are damn accurate 
- Post #6,014
- Quote
- Edited at 8:15am Mar 3, 2017 8:05am | Edited at 8:15am
EURUSD +9
entered too early, my fault, left level from yesterday, it was 1.0564, realised couple minutes after execution
entered too early, my fault, left level from yesterday, it was 1.0564, realised couple minutes after execution
- Post #6,015
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 8:13am Mar 3, 2017 8:13am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Sep 2016 | 1,511 Posts
{quote} Hi Dale, connecting on st1's topic of the AUDUSD swing, I would like to follow-up (maybe because not much is happening,... today). Don't want to be boring and repeating myself here, but I had a question regarding this swing already a few days ago (as I was wondering whether it was tested or not). In your response you outlined it may be best to stock to it reduce the position size for the original level of 0.7595 add if trade is going against you at 0.7565 Actually I did not take at 0.7595, wanted to wait for the 0.7565 level. Which is where...
Iam in
- Post #6,016
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 8:38am Mar 3, 2017 8:38am
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Sep 2016 | 1,511 Posts
- Post #6,017
- Quote
- Mar 3, 2017 8:41am Mar 3, 2017 8:41am
- Joined Sep 2016 | Status: Member | 622 Posts
- Post #6,020
- Quote
- Edited at 9:40am Mar 3, 2017 9:10am | Edited at 9:40am
{quote} no dale, i am using icmarkets also but it didnt trigger my take profit. I am not sure how you got that +10. Did you exit at 1.0554 or you exited earlier?