
Fooled by randomness 15 replies
Best book on randomness in markets and market probabilities? 4 replies
MM - Using randomness against Asymmetric Leverage 12 replies
Thoughts on randomness and systems 40 replies
Poll: Are trends rooted in randomness? 16 replies
Disliked{quote} Hello Mingary, there are documented examples of people calling the market tops and bottoms on a regular basis, Gann's wheat trade was one such example. No one knows Gann's methods however they were rediscovered by a chap called DR. Jerome Baumring his work was later also simplified by Cowan who made some really precise stock market calls picking the low of the 2009 reversal to the day. So clearly there is some sort of motive force that drive markets that can be predicted in advance, otherwise it would not have been possible for the people...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think randomness is all about your persepctive.. Bit of a tangent, but i think it works! hahaIgnored
Disliked{quote} Youre right brother. Very right. you got the right attitude. I want to make a bold call to prove the part non randomness of the market. USDJPY IS CURRENTLY DISCOUNTED. ITS TRUE VALUE IS BETWEEN 124 AND 125. SO EXPECT TO GET BACK ABOVE 124. IF YALL NEED MORE PROOF THAT MARKET IS NON ALWAYS RANDOM BUT SOMETIMES NONRANDOM LET ME KNOWIgnored
Disliked{quote} For the doubters, hope youre gradually changing your minds about this market. The question shouldnt be is the market random? The question should be how do i profit from the littile nonrandom window of opportunity which lasts a few hours per pairIgnored
DislikedThe market is not random, the people here that say it is do not understand or have the correct analysis tools to make this comment. The market is pure supply and demand, what you can see every day is the market going to these areas of supply or demand to get the orders. To say that the people chasing these orders are just randomly entering the market on a whim is just foolish. You may not be able to say exactly where a market is going by when but clearly that does not mean its random, it means that you lack the tools to uncover its driving force....Ignored
DislikedI am not a professional trader, but i am a professional physics professor. I want to share with you my ideas about randomness. Randomness does not exists. It may exist at the quantum level (i think it doesn't, but someone would disagree with me) but surely not in the classical(i.e. every day life) level. What i mean is that price is random as much as a coin flip. While you can't possibily know the outcome, it s actually not random: it's a simple question of mechanics. So, price is random in the sense that you can't know where is going, but surely...Ignored
Disliked{quote} For the doubters, hope youre gradually changing your minds about this market. The question shouldnt be is the market random? The question should be how do i profit from the littile nonrandom window of opportunity which lasts a few hours per pairIgnored
Disliked{quote} I dont see how this is supposed to show some randomness in the market - the market DOES move for a reason. If it was truly random however, how come my indicators point to the USDJPY being oversold and it is ready to push up to the 1.24 level? I think that there are more profitable times than others, ie jumping on the sentiment band wagon, but if my indicators show the so called randomness (and no it is not the VPWMA -if not right, apologies i dont use this) I am sure other indicators will show the same thing... and if that is the case, then...Ignored
DislikedInteresting subject. Please allow me to contribute some thoughts: 1). There are many ways to make money in forex trading. (our aim is making money, right? 2). Yes, market is random. What is in the world NOt random? Everything is random. Even your mind is random. BUT, 3). this randomness is predictable. And, 4). there are many ways to do it. 5). the key is CONSISTENT ACTION. regards,Ignored
DislikedI am so contrarian that my intense "contrarianism" even applies to this statement (:Ignored
QuoteDislikedA. ...any way, it should not be a reason to cut the possibility to exchange.
QuoteDislikedB. Excuse me, but I really do not see what is the BIG DEAL with what GOBIGFX said..... beside a small argument which could be possible on how many % random and non-random.... beside that it is sure that markets are like he said.
QuoteDislikedC. Yes, every moves from the smallest, to the biggest, in markets are created by the willing to buy and or to sell, different sizes, with different reasons, at different times.... yes if no big willing, and big orders, or big events bring the herd to move hard, volatility and direction will not be there, so prices behaviors will seem random, and the price will find a clear direction for anyone to make a profit (at least form a directional point of view).
QuoteDislikedD. This conversation should have been better going to a more precise, deep and full talk to understand so WHEN and WHAT TO CHOOSE, AS INFORMATION, TO GET THE RIGHT FLOW OF INFORMATION AND ORDERS WE ARE LOOKING FOR (!!!)
QuoteDislikedC. Regarding of my own understanding, and personal experience, on how markets behave, I have notices the simple but clear phenomena:
Sometime a market will be affected in the way it should by new fundamental / information flow (Ex.: positive news, going up, negatives news going low), and some other time NO WAY, whatever fundamental / information flow come, the market first reacts to it (and some time not even), then refuse it, and go the other way (or do not move). What's going on?
What is going on is that there are multiple layers of participants...
QuoteDislikedMy point is, SURE information create imbalance and imbalance create moves. The only game in town is to figure it out. Other way to say, one would be a purist, and at the top of his game in that field, one could trade purely on information, without boring him self with charts.... That was the Old-School way of the tape readers...