You wonŽt get far with a strategy generated on one month of data. This WILL fail going forward. YouŽll need to use at least a few years, better 14 years+.
1
strategy builder/tester for new scalping strategy 1 reply
Forex strategy Builder FSB - forward values 1 reply
Strategy Builder FX Problem 6 replies
Strategy Builder FX Metatrader Problem?? 3 replies
Strategy Builder & MT4 2 replies
DislikedYou wont get far with a strategy generated on one month of data. This WILL fail going forward. Youll need to use at least a few years, better 14 years+.Ignored
The indicators calculate two MA lines - one calculated on the particular indicator and another one calculated on the market's close price. The indicators give signals on Convergence or Divergence between these MAs as follows:
We have Divergence when both MA are moving in opposite directions:
- Indicator MA rises and Market MA falls; or
- Indicator MA falls and Market MA rises.
We have Convergence when both MA are moving in equal direction:
- Indicator MA rises and Market MA rises; or
- Indicator MA falls and Market MA falls.
This indicators give equal signals for both long and short positions. For example, if there is a Convergence, they allow both opening long and short positions. It means that we can use this indicators for additional filters. They cannot determine the position direction alone.
The indicators can be placed in Opening Logic Condition slot and in Closing Logic Condition.
Changes from v3.1
This update includes also new versions of the Expert Advisors code and updates of the MT4 Bridge.
Changes in FSB Pro:
Changes in the Expert Advisors Code v26
Meta Trader may not recover previous EA settings of the running experts after re-exporting EAs with the new code. You have to check the settings of all running Experts if you override them.
Changes in the FSB-MT4 Bridge v11
The following screenshot show the EA settings for trading Binary Options.
Changes from v3.0
Changes in FSB:
Expert Advisors code v25
DislikedIt is called OOS - Out Of Sample testing. Some traders think that if a strategy works well on a past period and it confirms the performance on the new data, it proves that it is not over-optimized. However, the OOS doesn't prove that the strategy is not over-optimized for the full period. I personally don't see any value in OOS. See this topic for more info: OOS questionIgnored
DislikedIt sound strange but here is the prob.... I used FSB Demo data Full 2014 for H4 chart to build a strategy & it created a awesome strategy with 3.60+ System quality & also 400% ROE gain for the whole year!! Okzz Now I tested same strategy on 2015 Jan to April but now It showing within first 3 months It blow up the whole $1000 account!! Note: I used FSB for backtest, its super fast though!! My ques is.... If strategy cant even prove it self for next 1month at least then why we will be even bother to create a strategy that can gain thousands of $$$...Ignored
DislikedOk... If I use OOS 20% or 40% will it be reasonable for better strategy? Lets say for M30 chart I use 3000 data bars with 40% OOS & If i want to use this strategy for next week from Sep 21 to 25 will it be reasonable?Ignored
QuoteDislikedEven back tested result on FSB was bad but it appears in live trading its far more better that that
DislikedInfernal, I can recommend you to watch my video series for creating and analyzing EAs before start automatic trading on a live account. You can find it here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvom...WldbCHs10pT3qP It is about 5 hours video that barely scratches the surface of the EA development and trading. {quote} A strategy with a good backtesting result "may" make money on the real market, but it is not going to be true for a strategy with a bad result. Trade Safe!Ignored