• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 3:42pm
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 3:42pm
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Thegman's Journal (Equity Millipede Concept) 102 replies

Trading an Equity Millipede 23 replies

Equity millipede & Flying Buddha trading journal 9 replies

Build an Equity Millipede with the filtered Flying Buddha 171 replies

Application Development - Journal of Building an equity millipede 14 replies

  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 1,138
Attachments: Building an equity millipede
Exit Attachments

Building an equity millipede

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 245246Page 247248249 372
  • 1 Page 247 372
  •  
  • Post #4,921
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 1:27pm Oct 3, 2011 1:27pm
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting Eklavya
Disliked
Let me talk about this last week. Taking hindsight from the previous week, my hindsight was down.
1. Had a limit order on Bar 2 and a stop order at 7700 level. This was overexposure. Lost 160 pips when price rocked back. Only one trade would have been good.
2. Entered a limit order at 50% of Bar 5. Lost 65 pips there. Good trade in my book.
3. Bar 7 was a pin bar back into the range. Took a short there and cut it quickly when price reversed. Again good trade.
4. Bar 8 closed the day as a bullish engulfing bar. Taking hindsight from daily now...
Ignored
http://www.forexfactory.com/attachme...4&d=1317658204
Few comments on this chart, hopefully you'll not be offended by tone:
3. - Bad trade. Used to entry like this until realized simple truth - in order for pin bar to be a valid signal there must be a preceeding trend with price losing steam (bars with small bodies) - here you have long, very strong bullish bar.
Moreover - look at spacing and direction of emas - when preceeding trend is fading you'll find them almost flat (directionless)
4. Bad trade. If your weekly hindsight is down - no point to invent new hindsight at one level lower. Stick to your plan.
5. Bad trade. - against your weekly hindsight.
6. Bad trade, again against weekly hindsight.

My opinion is one needs to have enough patience to stick to initial plan - weekly hindsight.

Moreover, the more trend progresses, the more spaced should be your stacks. In you example trades on bars 27 and 28 were overtrading and trying to catch the train which is gone few days ago.

In you chart I would enter short after bar 12, no trade on bar 13, one- two stacks on bar 14, all my shorts would be closed by BE on bar 15,
on bar 17 I would have 1 trade closed in small loss or BE, then bar 18 is a payday bar - I would enter at every good possibility as bar 17 made a new low and "almost" engulfed bar 15 + we have preceeding up trend.
Then on bar 19 I would add few more stacks, on bars 20-21 all my shorts except of 1-2 positions enerred early on candle 18 would be closed at BE and on bar 23 I would try to enter on its wick and definetely would enter on its body. On bar 24 I would add more shorts.
Bar 25 - no trade for me as price not moving any lower, bar 26 - same story, no trade within bar 24.
On bar 27 I would add one stack.
On bars 28-29 some of my shorts would be closed by BE or small loss and on bar 30 I would not enter new shorts until price would not be lower than minimum of bar 29 - as my shorts were closed recently - no point in overtrading - better wait and watch what price doing.

As bar 30 closed as engulging bar I would enter short on break of minimum of bar 29.

Doing so I would not overexpose myself and would still end up with 3-5 positions enterred EARLY in the trend, not in the bottom. Hopefully was helpful. If not you can simply ignore and forget.
 
 
  • Post #4,922
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 2:23pm Oct 3, 2011 2:23pm
  •  Eklavya
  • | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Member | 447 Posts
Quoting AlexanderSV
Disliked
Few comments on this chart, hopefully you'll not be offended by tone:
3. - Bad trade. Used to entry like this until realized simple truth - in order for pin bar to be a valid signal there must be a preceeding trend with price losing steam (bars with small bodies) - here you have long, very strong bullish bar.
Moreover - look at spacing and direction of emas - when preceeding trend is fading you'll find them almost flat (directionless)
4. Bad trade. If your weekly hindsight is down - no point to invent new hindsight at one level lower. Stick...
Ignored
Hi Alexander, thanks for taking the time to go through the chart and comment on it. I think there are some points we will just need to agree to disagree and move on. I am also constrained with taking the trades only at close of the bar. So i cannot trade intra-bar.

Beside the charts, I have a question. How do you get your chart above your post? I am never able to paste my chart in the post.
 
 
  • Post #4,923
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 2:43pm Oct 3, 2011 2:43pm
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting Eklavya
Disliked
Hi Alexander, thanks for taking the time to go through the chart and comment on it. I think there are some points we will just need to agree to disagree and move on. I am also constrained with taking the trades only at close of the bar. So i cannot trade intra-bar.

Beside the charts, I have a question. How do you get your chart above your post? I am never able to paste my chart in the post.
Ignored
Hi, mate.

In your early reply I saw you said you were trading "fake" breakout on bar 7.

If I may.. some patterns are more reliable than others. Fake breakout is not in my toolbox. Why? Low reliability. Low chance of winning. We only want to trade golden opportunities, remember Graeme's saying?

I put those his words deeply into me: we wait for preceeding trend to fade, then we enter in (or right after) nearest engulfing bar, even if it's unclosed yet, cause if we wait until it is closed - we may be late in a very good setup, forming on our screens right now.
It's always gives and takes, always. Wanna better trades - you risk more, you enter on unclosed bars, on wicks (basically countertrading, but in line with your hindsight). Or you wait for bars to close and then look for entries afterwards.

You said you only can trade at the close of the bar. This changes my comments a bit.
Preference would be to enter at 50% retracement from a setup candle, with SL few pips above extremum of the setup candle.

Again here one should use common sense. If setup canlde is wide, weekly/monthly ATR is almost or already passed - no point in entering cause R:R is just not attractive at all. Why risk now if we can risk next time with more accurate SL and with enough space for price to advance in coming weeks?

Tempting would be to enter staright away, at the close of the bar, if it was closed with little or no retrace. Can work... but SL would be too high, or we need to place it just above 50% retracement of this bar, assuming momentum is high enough not to let price retrace that far.

More to my comments.
In order to make a reversal price first needs to reach an equilibrium level, basically, consolidate more or less long time at certain range. Otherwise what you reckon as reversal is merely a retracement and a possibility to enter in direction of trend.

From you chart I assume you were thinking trend just reverses any day or any few days. This is not correct. In order for trend to change there must be degradation of some forces on the market and increase of power of other forces. Until this happens, trend remains the same as before our thinking about it's "reversal" point.

And please think about sticking to your initial plan until you find it's not working, which is for weekly plan when price starts trading above the open of prev. W1 bar, not before that.

P.S. For inserting image: - in the window where you type your reply, there is a yellow button "Insert image" - so you put a weblink to your image there and here you go.
Then you can cut and paste that piece of text with your link in any place of your post.
 
 
  • Post #4,924
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 4:36pm Oct 3, 2011 4:36pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
perhaps stating the obvious, but here's my 2 cents...

I think engulf bar is a bit overrated. There is almost always a retrace on the next candle just like most other candlestick patterns. Some weird ones also end up in complete 180 degree reversals!

To me, it makes more sense to always watch and wait for retrace instead of opening a probe right upon candle close.

Some core facts that applies to any chart/instrument:
- Open any chart and you will see more wicks all over the place compared to full body bars, inside bars, engulf bar, flying buddah or any PA pattern. Majority will be followed by a retrace.

- There is always a retrace in any trend, no matter how long or big the strength of prevailing trend is. Getting on a retrace will have the highest change of long term survival.

- Retrace on monthly/weekly means opposing short term trend on daily/h4 that could be used as an 'edge' especially to freeze their floating profits or short term diversification.

A couple of probes on tip of wick at 33%, 50%, EMA(5), EMA(10), S/R, trendline etc. on monthly or weekly is worth the pips spent. imo sending probes is just a sensible form of educated guess/speculation/gut feeling/striking it rich/hoping/rolling the dice etc etc. Consider those pips gone before you even send a probe as it is a sacrifice one is willing to make for bigger returns.
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,925
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 5:09pm Oct 3, 2011 5:09pm
  •  Eklavya
  • | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Member | 447 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked
perhaps stating the obvious, but here's my 2 cents...

I think engulf bar is a bit overrated. There is almost always a retrace on the next candle just like most other candlestick patterns. Some weird ones also end up in complete 180 degree reversals!

To me, it makes more sense to always watch and wait for retrace instead of opening a probe right upon candle close.

Some core facts that applies to any chart/instrument:
- Open any chart and you will see more wicks all over the place compared to full body bars, inside bars, engulf bar,...
Ignored
From experience, retrace is okay, but one needs to have a plan in case there is no retracement and the price explodes. I used to enter only on retraces and this has cost me 4 positions and 3000 pips in current series of NZDUSD short positions because price never came back to pick me up.

I still enter on retraces but also have a plan to enter in case there is no retracement.
 
 
  • Post #4,926
  • Quote
  • Edited at 5:39pm Oct 3, 2011 5:25pm | Edited at 5:39pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Quoting Eklavya
Disliked
From experience, retrace is okay, but one needs to have a plan in case there is no retracement and the price explodes. I used to enter only on retraces and this has cost me 4 positions and 3000 pips in current series of NZDUSD short positions because price never came back to pick me up.

I still enter on retraces but also have a plan to enter in case there is no retracement.
Ignored

yep... "have a plan" = cellphone alerts defined at 1st of the month or on weekends.

The only exception I personally prefer is to send a probe at open of next candle when I see a long(er) wick in one direction and zero or very small wick in the direction of your hindsight (3rd candle in the image below)

Attached Image


Edit: Here's one more example weekly A/U I took yesterday.
Attached Image
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,927
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 5:41pm Oct 3, 2011 5:41pm
  •  tradpat
  • | Joined Jul 2010 | Status: I LOVE MACD | 511 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked

The only exception I personally prefer is to send a probe at open of next candle when I see a long(er) wick in one direction and zero or very small wick in the direction of your hindsight (3rd candle in the image below)

Attachment 798981

Edit: Here's one more example weekly A/U I took yesterday.
Attachment 798994
Ignored
pls. advice how do you interpret candlestick using longer vs smaller wicks? tq.
cheers
 
 
  • Post #4,928
  • Quote
  • Edited at 11:11pm Oct 3, 2011 6:58pm | Edited at 11:11pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Quoting tradpat
Disliked
pls. advice how do you interpret candlestick using longer vs smaller wicks? tq.
cheers
Ignored
deleting my response....
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,929
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 8:08pm Oct 3, 2011 8:08pm
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked
perhaps stating the obvious, but here's my 2 cents...

I think engulf bar is a bit overrated. There is almost always a retrace on the next candle just like most other candlestick patterns. Some weird ones also end up in complete 180 degree reversals!
Ignored
Hi, Vee.
Indeed, there is almost always a retrace. "Almost" is key word here - many enough times there is no retracement, as candle closed just in the middle of strong momentum.
Sometimes I found myself being too careful with not entering straight away with small SL just to realize that price never came back to take my trade.

Besides eng. bar pattern, I can't remember any other reliable pattern showing by close of the candle that bears or bulls just completely overruled their counterparty. Especially if it's eng bar with small wicks.

I think if we can set a sound and small enough SL when entering right after candle close - waay better than setting pending order with bigger SL (above or below candle extremum) - especially if that was a dirty candle, with wicks.

Can you or anyone here please name any other reliable patterns showing just what eng. bar shows or point to source where to read? Perhaps I'm not aware of such so far, so would appreciate your help.

Regards,
Alexander

P.S. It was a good attack on this mate, asking for help)) Not that it was good to attack smb asking for help, but you just did it right, with patience and attention to details.
 
 
  • Post #4,930
  • Quote
  • Oct 3, 2011 8:24pm Oct 3, 2011 8:24pm
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting tradpat
Disliked
pls. advice how do you interpret candlestick using longer vs smaller wicks? tq.
cheers
Ignored
Hi,
Besides practicing, take your time and think yourself about form and size and where you see this or that candle. Think about candle as battle of two forces, wicks just show you about locations where those battles were held, body can tell you where it's all started, where it finished and who won.

Take you time and carefully study post no. 1383 in this thread by Graeme.
This is one of my favourite posts written by Graeme.

And through practice as Vee suggested you'll unlikely ask many of the questions you still have on this method. Knowledge is queen of success, but practice is king. Everyday, devote your time for studying charts and improve.
 
 
  • Post #4,931
  • Quote
  • Oct 4, 2011 9:08am Oct 4, 2011 9:08am
  •  IbrahimTamim
  • | Joined Jul 2010 | Status: Member | 14 Posts
Is there a PDF file for this thread??
 
 
  • Post #4,932
  • Quote
  • Oct 4, 2011 9:14am Oct 4, 2011 9:14am
  •  Eklavya
  • | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Member | 447 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked
yep... "have a plan" = cellphone alerts defined at 1st of the month or on weekends.

The only exception I personally prefer is to send a probe at open of next candle when I see a long(er) wick in one direction and zero or very small wick in the direction of your hindsight (3rd candle in the image below)

Attachment 798981

Edit: Here's one more example weekly A/U I took yesterday.
Attachment 798994
Ignored
Hi Vee,

Sorry to put you in a spot but can you show with charts how you have used the cellphone alerts and then are you willing to call out a few levels at the weekend and execute your plan when the levels get hit during the week? I think it will be a helpful exercise for everyone.
 
 
  • Post #4,933
  • Quote
  • Oct 4, 2011 10:33am Oct 4, 2011 10:33am
  •  Eklavya
  • | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Member | 447 Posts
Quoting IbrahimTamim
Disliked
Is there a PDF file for this thread??
Ignored
NO. I don't believe there is a pdf file with postings from all thread participants. There is however a pdf file with almost all of Graeme's posts. If interested, please search the thread for my posting and you will find a link to the pdf.
 
 
  • Post #4,934
  • Quote
  • Oct 4, 2011 12:14pm Oct 4, 2011 12:14pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Quoting AlexanderSV
Disliked
Hi, Vee.
Indeed, there is almost always a retrace. "Almost" is key word here - many enough times there is no retracement, as candle closed just in the middle of strong momentum.
Sometimes I found myself being too careful with not entering straight away with small SL just to realize that price never came back to take my trade.

Besides eng. bar pattern, I can't remember any other reliable pattern showing by close of the candle that bears or bulls just completely overruled their counterparty. Especially if it's eng bar with small wicks.

I...
Ignored
I have removed my inappropriate response as I am in no place to tell folks what to do around here.

This post by Graeme http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...76#post3966476 got me thinking further on engulf bars and wick intrepretations.

I don't believe, it is clear (atleast to me) why the smaller size of wick matters on the candle before the engulf bar.

Based on wick interpretation principles, shouldn't it be more like this for a more powerful confirmation?
Attached Image


EDIT: Same question for long engulfing pattern also.
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,935
  • Quote
  • Oct 4, 2011 12:26pm Oct 4, 2011 12:26pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Quoting Eklavya
Disliked
Hi Vee,

Sorry to put you in a spot but can you show with charts how you have used the cellphone alerts and then are you willing to call out a few levels at the weekend and execute your plan when the levels get hit during the week? I think it will be a helpful exercise for everyone.
Ignored
I have already caused too much clutter on this thread with my meaningless posts. Besides, it is way to early for me to call out. I just started using alerts past couple of months. Perhaps a trading journal is in order once I complete this journey. Next stop for me is risk/money management, trading/business plan, blotter/statistical modeling and a few more

I will say this though... I use alerts for the sole purpose of making a quick probe in an 'area' of interest where I anticipate compelling momentum to enable me to move SL to BE within next 5-15 mins. If there is no momentum or price approaches slowly, it becomes a fake alert with no action required. I am also using this to complete my 3x30TP exercise with the limited time I can devote to FX.
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,936
  • Quote
  • Edited Oct 5, 2011 10:42am Oct 4, 2011 12:47pm | Edited Oct 5, 2011 10:42am
  •  Eklavya
  • | Joined Dec 2007 | Status: Member | 447 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked
I have removed my inappropriate response as I am in no place to tell folks what to do around here.

This post by Graeme http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...76#post3966476 got me thinking further on engulf bars and wick intrepretations.

I don't believe, it is clear (atleast to me) why the smaller size of wick matters on the candle before the engulf bar.

Based on wick interpretation principles, shouldn't it be more like this for a more powerful confirmation?
http://www.forexfactory.com/attachme...8&d=1317744713

EDIT: Same question for long engulfing...
Ignored
Here is the way Graeme's candles look in his post.
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/8601/aa1u.png

In my opinion, if you think about what graeme is trying to show on a shorter timeframe, this is a false breakout and then a breakout in the opposite direction. And this is where the strength of the B/O comes from. Price fakes out in one direction and then explodes in the other.

To complete the thought, if you look at YOUR candles (higher upper wick on the 1st candle), the price is in a channel and is at the bottom trend channel line and would be a good place to long on a lower timeframe.
 
 
  • Post #4,937
  • Quote
  • Oct 5, 2011 6:46am Oct 5, 2011 6:46am
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked

I don't believe, it is clear (atleast to me) why the smaller size of wick matters on the candle before the engulf bar.

Based on wick interpretation principles, shouldn't it be more like this for a more powerful confirmation?
http://www.forexfactory.com/attachme...8&d=1317744713

EDIT: Same question for long engulfing pattern also.
Ignored

Hi, Vee.

In theory, the less the ATR of preceeeding bars to engulfing bar, and the bigger the ATR of engilfing bar - serves as better confirmation (actually already as market action, not only confirmation). Logic here is: market stalled, ATR was low, price was almost flat (wicks or small wicks mean there were little attempts of either force to change the candle color).

For engulfing bar with biger up wicks in your example logic is this:
after price stalled for some bars, ther was attempt of one force to break the range. Eventually that attempt was unsuccessful and opposite force punished them, going much-much below the range instead. So that bullish attempt was fixed on our screens as upper wick.

If that were bearish eng bar with small or no upper wick would mean to me that there were almost no buyers to support the price above candle open level, so sellers just completely ruled the show, and only lower wick on eng bar shows us there were attempt of buyers to struggle in letting eng candle close at that level, so they pushed price a bit higher. So, bigger top wick on eng bar shows there were buyers trying to push price higher, whilst small bottom wick on eng bar shows lack of buyers (miserable power to push price any higher than candle low).

To me, small wicks or no wicks at all means very favorite situation allowing me to go with the flow of orders. It just means clear, concise intention of one force to push price either up or down, with no opposing factors in place.

I like to wait until price reached that equilibrium point, where neither buyers nor sellers can move price any higher or lower, for extended time. This is best moment to make a sniper short when either side starts winning.

Regards,
Alexander
 
 
  • Post #4,938
  • Quote
  • Oct 5, 2011 1:12pm Oct 5, 2011 1:12pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Quoting AlexanderSV
Disliked
Hi, Vee.

In theory, the less the ATR of preceeeding bars to engulfing bar, and the bigger the ATR of engilfing bar - serves as better confirmation (actually already as market action, not only confirmation). Logic here is: market stalled, ATR was low, price was almost flat (wicks or small wicks mean there were little attempts of either force to change the candle color).

For engulfing bar with biger up wicks in your example logic is this:
after price stalled for some bars, ther was attempt of one force to break the range. Eventually that attempt...
Ignored
got my answer right last night after I posted my question but thanks for your response. It's amazing how our mind functions.... it can do anything after a little bit of perseverance :-
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,939
  • Quote
  • Oct 5, 2011 1:23pm Oct 5, 2011 1:23pm
  •  VEEFX
  • Joined Jun 2006 | Status: Adios! | 3,377 Posts
Here's some food for thought....

#1: If we are looking for other buyers/sellers to join us before/after our compelling momentum based entry, doesn't it make logical sense from a price action interpretation standpoint to reflect your charting software based on the current session times you are making entries? My charts allow me to switch timezones to GMT, EST or local... so flipping to GMT timezone during London session and to EST timezone during US session would probably increase the success rate of your PA based entries.

#2: Has anyone considered taking probes in a demo account (for breakouts, Flying buddah or any of the low probability setups) and if probe survives, start stacking in your live account???
Staying in my lane...
 
 
  • Post #4,940
  • Quote
  • Oct 6, 2011 5:44am Oct 6, 2011 5:44am
  •  AlexanderSV
  • | Joined Dec 2009 | Status: Member | 91 Posts
Quoting VEEFX
Disliked
Here's some food for thought....

#1: If we are looking for other buyers/sellers to join us before/after our compelling momentum based entry, doesn't it make logical sense from a price action interpretation standpoint to reflect your charting software based on the current session times you are making entries? My charts allow me to switch timezones to GMT, EST or local... so flipping to GMT timezone during London session and to EST timezone during US session would probably increase the success rate of your PA based entries.

#2: Has anyone considered...
Ignored
Hello, Vee.

#1: I think price is more universal and above any artificial boundaries. FX has no pre-market, market open and market close as stocks.

Price can make gigantic moves at any hour of any "session". Statistically, during London/US and on Thursdays volatility increases, but that doesn't mean trader needs to focus only on that period; signal for entry may appear at any moment 24/5.

I think it's an option to focus on cyclic character of price, identifying periods of calmness and storm, rather than narrowing our mind and opportunities to certain window. This can be done either visually, or using simple standard ATR indicator, with some nowledge and charts studies, proving that statistically when say ATR10 on H1 for EU was below 20 for at least few bars, price make a strong move thereafter in 80% of the cases (as an example).

#2 On using demo for probes and real for entries if demo probe proves to be correct.

Some time ago I wrote MT4 Expert Adviser, taking "ghost" trades and if price moved enough real trade was opened. The testing result of such strategy was not good, playing with params was just curve-fitting. If market gave a signal so you opened a demo trade, there is no enough evidence price'll continue moving in same direction. Signal was valid, but instead of opening probe on real we used demo, and right after that price retraced taking our real account trade stopploss. My opinion is that there is not enough edge in this logic. Moreover, I think using two accounts can create more mess and blur the focus on trading, where you know you put your real money at risk.

Just my opinion, but I think "edge" is in practising method and applying right psychology to trading. I think there is no obvious edge using demo for probes, unless you know what you're doing and may be that it is something unique and known exclusively to you (perhaps you have some non-trivial ideas).

Regards,
Alexander
 
 
  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • Building an equity millipede
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 245246Page 247248249 372
    • 1 Page 247 372
1 member viewing:
Snegur
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2022