Disliked{quote} As a general statement, sure why not! But I made my statement in reference to Peter. If you are suggesting Peter is an experienced trader then no, he is incapable of distinguishing between noise, harmony, or the numerous voices shouting in his empty head.Ignored
While the egotistical brats on this site still want to puff out their chest and still believe they're at the apex of everything trading related, some of us know what we know because we've experienced it and not because we've only read about it or due to merely believing our story. Some people should just stick to talking about what they DO know and stay away from anything real.
Stupid arguments about TF's. Either IT is the tool or YOU are the fool. It's amazing how many people "profess" to be a trader yet all they've done is stayed in their little comfort zone. THAT is not learning or trading, that's just running scared.
It's funny you know, all the "talk" in the world from many people but by using a factual real life third party document, it seems to send them into damage control. And the best they can come up with is "I don't like what you're saying so I want to fight you, head to head." I'm sorry, maybe I missed a step, are we still in primary school???
So GEfx (or whoever or whatever you are) - what is YOUR definition of an experienced trader? And please bear in mind that some of us have experienced things that you haven't, so THAT will add to the critique provided, since you think me inept and benign as a person and a private trader.
Peter
Real Trading is not gambling.
2