Disliked{quote} Now you are getting somewhere. Octives rule ! Masterrmind...........Ignored
270 as 1.3038
180 As 1.2936
135 as 1.2847
90 as 1.2797
2
How to make EA that send Open Price of Candle for every new candle 5 replies
Day's first H4 candle correlation to daily candle 14 replies
Correlation between first 4 hour candle and daily candle 1 reply
quad core multiple CPU's, multiple MT4 sessions, Virtual Machine 53 replies
Disliked{quote} Now you are getting somewhere. Octives rule ! Masterrmind...........Ignored
Disliked{quote} Nope its also a valid GG. Check for initial GG alignment, then check for current PA alignment. Decide which scaling 'better' fits the PA of the current chart. If nothing looks ideal in your assessment then put that symbols analysis onhold and search for an alternative. You will find many current examples that fit very nicely. Do not forget the Upward GG as it too is valid, no matter the 'assumed' trend direction. Masterrmind............Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for the clarification. I still have to review this to better understand it. I think from those examples the -97.5 grid looks better? I will have to look more at this and understand it before moving to the Square of Nine methodology you explain. As you mentioned it's better to take it easy and make it a useful tool in the hands of the trader instead of making it a mess. It's amazing how the Master Octive extreme zones seem to attract confluence giving better chances to trades. I'm looking at the XAU-EUR D1 chart and it seems to...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes that's good. In Excel what you want to do now is copy that sheet, rename it as Gann_Dates (or something similar) and do the following: 1. Find the YRD date and enter it in as the central value (you can format the data to any date option in Excel that suits you); 2. Apply the value 1 as the step. Now you should be able to generate a Gann date SQ9. When completed please post to the thread. Hint: you should get something very similar to what I posted several posts back. Masterrmind............Ignored
Disliked{quote} I see 270 as 1.3038 180 As 1.2936 135 as 1.2847 90 as 1.2797Ignored
Disliked{quote} By gum you are a hard task master, my head needs a rest after my 1st effort, just in the process of copying my square and assigning one to each pair.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Cardinal cross ('+') typically takes precedence over ordinal cross ('x') but not always ofcourse since big market moves by big players can have an over-riding impact at least over the shorter term horizon. Masterrmind...........Ignored
Disliked{quote} I recognise lots of the numbers from the square and if you look along the 360 180 line you see 1.3187 and next door you see 1.2695 these tie in with Murrey 2/8 and 0/8 th off a 256Ignored