Guys, maybe I repeat myself but this para-trading system unfortunately does not meet the criteria of a true professional trading system, maybe we can talk about some good idea of "position management"... but we are still very far from a professional ...

I forgot, with reference to resistance levels that you mentioned ... no I believe that these levels will suffer an imminent break but I also believe that this should not occur before a partial response to the recent bullish movement...

With regard to the analysis that enable me to determine the different levels on which to operate, this is possible through a proprietary algorithm quite complex but has the requirement of completeness, it is a set of equations that tries to ...

Taking into account my previous advice, now for those who use this system, the next positive divergence should be good to sell ... but be careful with exposure ... the underlying trend remains bullish!!! I hope my contributions are welcome, regards ...

Hi guys, if I remember correctly some time ago I suggested to consider only buying signals, I would also suggest, if I can, to avoid using this system faithfully (taken literally, this system is too young and incomplete, also requires a dose of ...

Ok, now we are ready to go long, there's probably still room for further stabilization of prices but the next negative divergence is certainly a good signal to buy (this if you don't want to be in the market too soon, I personally am already in!) ...

Here you can find an article that perhaps best explains the meaning of my speech: In the forex market, huge volume makes even big interventions very hard. The SNB’s intervention had a short lived effect last time, and this time is no different - the ...

If you believe you can operate in the forex market without a constantly monitoring the operation of monetary policy implemented by the various central banks then you are on the wrong side!!! What you see is the effect of further intervention by the ...

Keep our eyes open!!! — Hi guys, it is very likely that this corrective movement is not yet fully completed, my opinion is that there are still 30 days (approximately) and then the cross should begin to rise! Regards, Stake...

It would have been sufficient to channel your energies in trying to understand the content, and the reason, of this thread to be able to do a little light on what seems to be your question and thus the reason for your indulgence ... Have I, never, ...

There are no problems ... thread closed!!! I don't want even to replay to insults of these gentelemen, I have many other things to think ... P.S. Attached a further confirmation of my large ego_

If the advance from 1.4699 is an impulse, then the EURCHF should hold 1.4699 and begin a rally that eventually exceeds 1.4988. Coming under 1.4699 would not change the bullish implications from the cycles of higher degree ...

No I am not surprised by this, in my expectation was also that of encountering one of these masters of the rhetoric of peanuts, these modern jesters of virtual in constant search of their King, someone who can show them the way, someone who can ...

With great regret I must note that a good part of my intention here has been misunderstood. I'm not looking for consensus as well as the idea of participating in the race to win the title of best trading system is so far from me, but equally I have ...

I regret for this your haughty attitude, this sounds like a lack of humility ... I don't like to argue and raise the provocative, please!

I think we are all the elements to understand what we are doing here, I repeat the concept of the snowballing is not a concept coined recently (with all my respect) but it is part of a broader approach to trading, it would be incorrect to think of ...

One more thing, let me say that to judge something without having the proper knowledge of what you are judging me seems almost in bad taste ... forgive me!

I appreciate your kindness in wanting to protect the originality and certainly the not comparable knowledge, preparation and experience of FTI's own thread, but what you're saying would make sense if I had claimed to have something in common with ...

Of course, the step was taken from a passage of FTI's Thread, but you are wrong when you say that I have not mentioned the source (although this would not be a problem, a valid concept remains always a valid concept!!!)... In any case I referred to ...