Peter, your English has returned to, what is for you, normal. Unfortunately, your comment is, what is for you, normally idiotic. Do you understand what a recession is? And do you understand that your comments are unrelated to the subject of the ...

Clearly not the United States.

Again, your words. You need to check your thinking skills. You think bullshit and then write it down here on FF. I just pointed out in the above post, the irony in your thoughts. One day, deep down inside, you will appreciate my efforts to correct ...

Peter, first you said: "Young people only really fit in to two categories here" Then you said: "Young people need to stop listening to idiots who tell them "there's only two choices" The irony is delicious, don't you think? By the way, I agree with ...

Peter, I don't think you are backwards. I've never said that. I think you are a low voltage thinker, because you prove, with every post, that you are unintellegent. You can't string together two coherent sentences. You ramble on with unstructured ...

Wow! Just....wow! In conclusion, Peter, you know nothing about inflation. You know nothing about economics. Based on your comments, you and your muddled thoughts exist outside of society, in something you call the real world. In your addled brain, ...

I'm embarrassed for you, Peter. You are mentally weak and defenseless. You know nothing and have even less to say. Any chance you'll get back to your ideas on the topic of inflation? Maybe post a few more outdated charts? List a few more irrelevant ...

I can always count on you, Peter, to string together some low-voltage, non-sequitur blather. You always harp on other people's thinking, but you're incapable of documenting any signs of coherent thought. Let me remind you, in case it's slipped your ...

You laugh at this site, yet you post your low-voltage thinking here. No one should take you seriously, Peter. Your depth of knowledge about inflation would not fill a thimble, as demonstrated by your idiotic posts and charts.

You posted a map (an outdated map showing Nato countries and Russia) and made reference to the linkages between the Scandinavian countries and Russia (apparently unaware of the facts that Finland just joined Nato and that many of those linkages had ...

Peter, the first two sentences make no sense. Again, you just string along words of unconnected thoughts without clear thinking or meaning. Your thinking is confused and disjointed. But you already know that. I said WW2 to today, not just WW2. Your ...

Peter you just proved my point: you assume and write a lot about me, while avoiding an explaination of your thinking. You posted the map. How does it tie to the NATO article? Are you capable of explaining your thinking? As for trading, you are a ...

One final comment to Peter. I have traveled to Sweden (3 times), Finland (1 time), Saint Petersburg (2 times), and Moscow (1 time). I'm aware of the history of each country, and their interconnected histories, with special emphasis on WW2 through ...

Like I said, you should think before you post. The attached article is about NATO concerns that Russia is a possible threat to US and European infrastructure. You posted some nonsense about Scandinavian/Russian relations, apparently unaware that ...

Finland is part of NATO, and Sweden will likely be in soon, too. Your map is wrong, and whatever territorial associations you beleve exists, don't. Try thinking before posting.

Bullshit!

Wouldn't be nice if these ass wads at FF provided a little context with posts like this?

If I were May, I'd consider the following: 1. Tell the EU that you are going to suspend negotiations for an unspecified period of time 2. Focus all your energies on trade negotiations with the US, China, Japan, So Korea, Russia, etc and get as many ...

It was a reaction to the Die Zeit news flash, and subsequent denial.

And a few hours after this is posted, the S&P downgrades begin.