- Search Forex Factory
- 1,920 Results (8 Threads, 1,912 Replies)
- stevefx replied May 17, 2020
Both pendings no longer valid. AC got bought a few point ahead of entry and GA broke the low.
- stevefx replied May 14, 2020
ok took less than half a percent loss on EJ trade. Not really a thing, just that I'm a bit frustrated because I knew that it was sub par. Another pending on GBP/Aud, short. Its in trend with a distinct touch on S/R which broke the low. Thats the ...
- stevefx replied May 13, 2020
Here's a pending long on AudChf. I'd take this any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Hope it fills.
- stevefx replied May 13, 2020
So here for my first posted entry is this long on EJ which is on the low end of what I'd trade. Problems are that its heavily countertrend and the SR is not as precise as I'd like it to be. I might be dogged on it but maybe not we'll see. My risk on ...
- Simple Confluence TJ
I've been out of it a bit, but started back in recently. Mostly when I've been routinely ...
- stevefx replied May 17, 2019
Price hit some nice untouched supply on the Daily at 8200. Opens the way maybe to 6150-I'd like some there pls..
- stevefx replied May 14, 2019
If we don't have enough data to validate the cycles scientifically that's one thing. I don't think the people who created the chart were going for that though-they were just trying to show an existing trend. I don't know how they adjusted for the ...
- stevefx replied May 14, 2019
Anyway here's one price model illustrating Stock to Flow..Source is named on the chart. And some further reading on the subject from Forbe's which gives a pretty balanced view of the matter. url
- stevefx replied May 14, 2019
Yes the cycles are constant but the effects on price are not due the exponential nature of the halving process. This isn't exactly the theory but I think the general idea is that ex. 100 more coins left to be produced at 100$, 50 more coins at 200$, ...
- stevefx replied May 14, 2019
But cycle length is following halving process. Stock to flow theory-which has been true so far. Its not just random fibo sequence, or at least that's my take on it..
- stevefx replied May 14, 2019
This might get interesting if you can elaborate as to why not..
- stevefx replied May 13, 2019
I am taking some longs at 10058 based on Daily Chart. Where it will be tomorrow I don't know. Small target is 140 and aggressive is 270. Its got to turn first..
- stevefx replied May 12, 2019
Yeah cause platform coins got some kind of negative association with ICO's and tech that won't be used any time soon-not store of value, bad investment-but increased market adoption can fix that and these might turn out to be the diamonds. I guess ...
- stevefx replied May 12, 2019
Yes that's right.
- stevefx replied May 12, 2019
I don't really want to get into a big technical analysis cause this isn't a crypto thread. But historical price patterns don't like breaking new highs any time soon. Parabolic phases are taking longer to arrive as more money flows in. This is a ...
- stevefx replied May 12, 2019
I like where your head is at. BTC could face some resistance on dominance chart versus alts. I've always been partial to Neo - its in bargain basement territory. Makes Gas and nice tech..
- stevefx replied Mar 20, 2019
Don't buy too many new coins but picked up some of this off KuCoin url
- stevefx replied Dec 18, 2018
XLM might be a flag.
- stevefx replied Dec 15, 2018
Just bored so I'll share some thoughts about it. Generally the future of crypto seems to be tied to so many abstractions-the Greater Fool theory is another, probably not important one. Important abstractions might be: the preeminence of Bitcoin in a ...
- stevefx replied Dec 6, 2018
Good read, url