- Search Forex Factory
- 73 Results
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
Like you are LOL you convinced nobody either. Besides there are more pro-hedging than a few the same anti hedging . I lose my time on this no ending debate . Another deny of truth coming from you, that's why makes no sense to lose my time here.
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
Why don't you say the truth ? See, it's nonsense to lose my time anymore on this thread It was jones who was ready to show to Merlin hedging is profitable, but Merlin just didn't sustain LOL his offer: See it here:
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
I didn't won nothing, i don't have a real account but on demo hedging was an aid for me, when i losed , i losed due a single unhedged position. When I hedged , some times both position were winners, so over all , i won by hedging. Keep waiting , i ...
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
Sure, but moving the money between accounts implies additional costs, bank commissions , and majority of the brokers charge you for moving account money too, so we didn't needed this rule because you see ,even like that it it makes you earn less ...
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
That is what i also said , both sides are free to have their own opinions. As nanningbos and Adam said , hedging IS an big aid for a trader, even if sometimes is just flat betting, - thing is, like others said ,if one position is on a small retrace ...
- Redox77 replied May 10, 2009
I agree with all what you said. one thing is for sure , when some goes to bed he has to lose more : - or by inserting SLses ( and we know how brokers hunt those SL-ses, - or by closing the losing positions with a loss. So we didn't need this rule ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
Well, this is yours, pipmutts and smittens opinion,and there are some more , very good traders ,btw, ..., you are free to have your opinion , it's very good you have an opinion, though, sorry but others have OTHER opinions . Ok you three, and some ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
OK, so in the end ,majority, ( not all from beginning though ), but nice and easy admitted hedging is profitable if applied corectly, sure might be also dangerous, but if your attentive might bring benefits and profit. Example : flat-smittens kept ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
OMG !! ...oooh boy.....ohh boy... please pipnutt , don't make a fool of yourself, Pipnutt- buddy , how dumb can you be ??? don't you saw all the posts of traders not happy about this rule ? I'm sure all those are not dumb using hedging , I'm sure ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
Who said profitable hedgers use hedging only like that ? They use it embedded in more subtile strategy, you can't comprehend and no way tell it to you, i preffer to let u screw ur 2nd account ( NFA didn't set a rule against drinking, you might ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
LOL: Deniying those not happy about the no hedging rule is dening someting it exists, they wouldn't have had existed if hedging wouldn't be profitable,if done with head ( well, not a flat head, smittens and pipnutt or pipmutt whatever lol) Some just ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
- I know hanover doesn't agree with me, so what, everybody is free, to have his own opinion , anyway his way smarter than you only by looking at his forum posts - He also came here with some thread links, this is good for a debate....you...nada.. ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
LOL , what r u doing there, r u choking on the floor ..take please a pill, u might make a stroke , we don't want that.. I know hanover doesn't agree with me, so what, everybody is free, to have his own opinion , anyway his way smarter than you only ...
- Redox77 replied May 9, 2009
haha,some people need to read something like 100 times to get it. (ie smittens , i'm afraid it's useless in his case even after he reads 1000 times ) Hi Hanover, Yes I did because those arguments are to much obvious , only "flat " thinking people ...
- Redox77 replied May 8, 2009
My opinion is everyone is free to express his opinion, both sides. But my opinion , and course the truth is this 1- hedging if applied not corectly , might indure a only smal lousy 3 pip loss ( the spread ) , NOT 2 spreads, first was ALREADY ...
- Redox77 replied May 8, 2009
Very well said. Hedging in same pair is done by many traders more subtile ,like you do or anyway are many hedging strategies, those people didn't passes the first grade , all math they know is 1-1 =0 Guess what( not you , there are some i talked ...
- Redox77 replied May 8, 2009
ahah , you obvious liked that , pip-nutt. You started when you first replyed to me , so i just give you back , i know u like it, so take it buddy. oh , please don't get drunk, NFA didn't yet proclaimed a rule against drinking and you might insert ...
- Redox77 replied May 8, 2009
Yeah , you said it, LOL, so they should have done something about complainings regarding brokers,like slippage , requotes, forums are full of them, pipmutt-logic, and not a rule for traders . ..not profitable for traders.... What an aberation !!! ...
- Redox77 replied May 7, 2009
Thank you for your opinion sir. It was very helpful to me . So till now Alpari -UK against IBFX is 3-0
- Redox77 replied May 7, 2009
I also trade demo with alpari -uk...I also get endless "invalid prices" errors . Did you get them too....? - I checked that "Enable maximum deviation from quoted price" in the order window to max 3 pips , but they want more pips ..if i want that ...