He’s gonna need to revise a few books!

This makes quite the pairing with this week's strong advanced GDP report.

Check the title of the data series, guys, it has your answer. The second sentence of the article does, too This is a revision to the preliminary data released two weeks ago: url

Seems the auction buyers yesterday had the right idea. Even more reason to scrutinize today’s dot plot!

GBTC already suffering from the fee war! Wild that they didn't slash that 150bps expense ratio to defend their advantage. Their loss - it's finally time to exit that trade and look for opportunities to roll into BTC at a cool 0bp expense ratio ...

See here: url

This is a ridiculously underresearched comment. Go look at his track record, you might be impressed: url I hope you put more effort than this into your trades.

Sometimes things just don't make sense, but you're also missing a key component here buddy.. What the market expected was going to happen... How does my expectation differ from the consensus. See "second-level thinking" in this classic: url

I suspect Powell's "Public confidence" rating is strongly correlated with the level and anticipated direction of rates and nothing else. No surprise there. It's the cheap-money chasers who are displeased now, but were not displeased when it was ...

Well.. that is awfully blunt

WOAH! Failure and save visible across no more than three trading days. Wild stuff

I think the "TECH CUTS 5K JOBS" headlines are fueling ideas of a rosy return to ZLB without respecting the actual magnitude of the numbers and industry. When this doesn't materialize to numbers everyone cries ...

Sounds like someone has clicked on one too many malicious links in his day.

I'd hazard a guess that there are many more assets more widely-owned by women than crypto Blockchain company surveys blockchain clients on use of blockchain and determines 90% of businesses use blockchain!

image

Is this ESG-related or something?

Is this guy serious?

Looks pretty hawkish across the board

You might be right here. Tough to say what the real relation to FTX.US is. That said, there are alot of people who want to see this guy go down, I would imagine this includes the professionals and regulators he made a mockery of. Wild to think ...

His explanation does make a lot of sense, and seems like a better fit to replace the VC investments portion of what I was thinking (which is really the meat of the issue, where losses occurred). The VC portion may have just been the sink where ...