Okay, I understand. That operational point that you add (previous levels, news...) to try to know when the price can really move or not, is what makes the indicators work and trying to avoid ranges, that is the complicated part of trading. ...

Following the thread and testing the indicators. Once you have the alert of the first indicator and the candle close above the level of the second indicator, do you enter taking into account any other concept? (distance traveled by the price, higher ...

So why do you share? Only the really bad ones?

Hello Eddyrj! If I use standard fibo mt4, I moved the graph a little so as not to leave the full fractal out and cast full fibo, but I see that you are basing it only on the complete movement that is seen on the screen after zooming out and zooming ...

In these cases there are several variables. 1- favorable price without moving average 2- price in favor with moving average 3- price in favor without space for BE and without moving average. Let me know your opinion with the management you do. ...

On my chart I have other levels because I have more bars than on yours. I see that you haven't caught the entire fractal image

It makes sense, now it's time to test a little and see how the system develops a little. I will post an image for you to correct or give your opinion. Thank you

Hello Eddyrj The TP thing would confuse me with the pending orders that you have been publishing, believing that you placed a TP. I understand that the SL you place is like an emergency, but you quickly start managing it with the moving average. ...

Hello, several questions that arise, if you can clarify. I see that you place pending orders with SL and TP, but live it seems that the TP is not a fixed stop, but rather that you let it run? What do you base a SL that is wider than the TP, for the ...

Okay I understand The capture would be correct according to the graph so far?. I like it because it enters liquidity zones in favor of the trend that the structure is setting. image

Hello Eskurrr. Once the highest point is broken, you wait again for a retracement of 40 pips to start the cycle, is that correct? A clarification, in its last capture in real time, If the price enters the delimited zone of 40 pips (20 above and 20 ...

Thanks for the answer and details.

I understand that it enters when the price re-enters the bands, through the marked box. I have the ATR by multiplying x 10 And in case of 2nd entry, let MA return to the level of the 2nd to make a 3rd entry?, increasing the lotage in each one, for ...

It is similar to this what you use Baiao1906. I imagine that you configure the atr multiplier depending on the pair? The way the price is relative to the channel, would you make an entry? image

OK, thanks for the answer in detail, I'll try it and show you in case I'm not doing something right

Did you use any filter for the first entry, such as a certain separation, price action, etc, in addition to the RSI? And once he had two inputs, would he let the 2nd MA reach his level to average a 3rd?

It was an idea as a possibility, I have not tested the system yet, but I think that being able to get out with profits is as it says, letting MA reach the first entry before averaging

If I have several entries losing, I would look for a higher TF liquidity point to add. The RSI since the downtrend began is indicating oversold with possible entries...

Thanks for the clarification. I understand that the entry is looking for a point at which the spread rises and with RSI in an overbought/sold situation, with this a large number of occasions may be in profit. But what requirement or idea does he use ...

Interested in following the thread and how to solve the mean reversion. About the MA200 I would distinguish two cases. 1 when the price returns to the mean. 2 when the mean returns to the price. Obviously case 2 is a problem when we find a trend.