Nearly at half of the reading journey ( around page 140 at the moment )... I have a question for the more experienced traders of this methodology: How do you handle the situation when price tests the previous new daily Hi / Lo, fails to break it, ...

Thanks Hal7, that's correct: the question was (is) about either entering the trade even without any kind of retest or not. Strictly applying the rules I sould not consider that trade as valid, but I think that probably - especially after a concrete ...

Enter here was at the open of H1(0) ? If yes: why ? (... looking for my AHA moment about the missing retest of the high ... ) Thanks image

....trying to understand a (for me) missing point.... Hope to be not too intrusive... image

...I know I may find the answer later (currently at post #926), and I accept the concept of "fluid meaning" connected to the " test " concept. Trying to filter out as much discreption as possible from this fluidity, as the rest of the strategy has ...

Here he would probably say: " ...waiting... " ? image

Hi Traders, I am enjoying reading this Thread. I am currently at page 22, LOL. It will take a long time for getting up to date, so I will probably find the answer to my question several times in between. BTW I noticed that " No Test - No Trade " ...

may be something with your audio ? By me it was all ok. Thanks FF

...often present people too... Lol

...dinamic factors... (Sorry guys, hard to use a phone for this... I posted too early and dont know how to edit from the phone), as : volume of the stop cloud, distance, timeframe of the stops (lts, mts, sts), volume of entering DM shorts/longs ...

...After a long time not posting on forex factory anymore, I really casually (well, being a strong believer of Cause/Effect I am just now wondering If this really casually...) cane accross this thread 2 days ago. It is not that easy to digest 40 ...

Hi Guys, there's a chart that today I would like to share with you all. I hope Akt won't mind. Just a short break. It has no bars, but if you take the time to think about it and read it with all the eyes you have I ensure you that it will ...

Hi Tradersam, of course, there may be several ways of looking at the same chart and, as we all well know, most of them (even a EMA Cross System) can be profitable, if applied with the right Psichology and / or Risk Management. So, absolutely full ...

I agree with Nojak, but that was actually not the reason of my post. My point is : I am not saying that was NOT a zone to short at. It is. I only would not sell with Set and Forget (but Confirmation) and I would also ask myself "where to put a ...

Hello Minosd, of course, after the fact we are all great traders , so I do not judge your entry at all, but instead use it for myself too for learning something for a potential next time. I didn't analyse other timeframes, but just looking ...

Hi Vickybha, just my guess: I suppose that your second question answers the first one. Having TG1 at that level - and having for rule to have at least a 3:1 - you can set your entry into the zone at a level that respects your rule. Of course, you ...

Hi Winston, I am the last one on board, so please accept the possibility for me to be wrong, but what I think you should be looking for the obvious and clear Swings that made new highs or new lows. This is what I think ( and keeping in mind where we ...

Thank you Autokon for your idea and Thank you Akt for commenting it. So does that mean that for looking at where we are in the Curve (Weekly chart), I should not consider the RBR that I mentioned, but instead better to consider that lower demand ...

Hello Traders, I would like to give a try in a TDA, with some questions in the pictures. Considering W, D, H4 I also used H1 because of an uncertain H4 situation. Any comment is welcome, thank you. image image image image

No, I guess probably not. It should connect the two most recent swing points creating new highs. image