Can you be a little more specific……….can you post the actual page……..or the sentence you read, that said, or talked about "this being used for spot instead of futures" Please do, as no such statement exists on page 1……….in the "preface".......or in ...

Eurusd

image

and how is that accomplished? And how is that accomplished? why is that? Why not one or two?

Being that "Price Data" (Price Action as you call it) is the raw material for "technical Analysis" and this thread deals in "Quantitative Analysis" We don't give a shit about a "price action" (series of prices) Because Most technical analysis works ...

Again, we are talking about MARKET UNITS..............you left out the "Context" of the post....................

We are not talking about "price waves"........we are talking about "Market Units" and "Balances" Market Waves are NOT Cycles Donald L. Jones Copyright CISCO Futures March 25, 2005 A hope of many technical analysts is that markets have a cyclic ...

Great post…………… There is a point in the balance-imbalance (directional) phase/cycle at which balance begins and ends. You need to first understand the "Rule" for determining "balances" and how they develop. You need to understand "why" the rule ...

I am looking for the explanation and the context found in the source material…….. Here's a clue………..what does the source material say? How do you know if your answer is correct or not if you didn't learn the rule by studying the source material? If ...

I am not interested in a simple "description"……..the "description" does not explain the "context" in which it is used. What is the "Rule" and why does this "Rule" exist……….

What is the "Rule" regarding "Balances and why?................. will someone please provide the proper "Context".

Just a reminder that I do not respond to AMVA questions sent in PM's………to avoid having to post the same answers more than once…..and so everyone can learn from the questions being asked……….. "Anyway before i'm asking anything i'm going to explain ...

Let me clarify............I use the method of "normalization" you see in the article below........ If you "normalize" this way......in this case you divide by 16.......... RI= 15/16= .9375 RI = (15/16)= 0.9375 (before normalization) NRI = RI - (1- ...

Now, will someone define what it means......... when we refer to QC= Quadrant of close. Will someone now explain the context in which it is used?........What do we mean by QC?

image the more detailed version....... image a Raw Rotation Index (RRI) is obtained by summing the 1s, then dividing the sum by 16) Both show different ways to "normalize" the same RRI result....... But the RRI is obtained the same way by ...

You nailed it! might I point out a small correction flip the matrix (Q's for rows, and T's for columns) "In this four-by-four example, a raw rotation index is obtained by summing the 1s, then dividing the sum by 16".............it looks ...

Finally, some context!........now that everyone knows RI is calculated from a "price-time matrix"......who's going to tell us what a matrix (matrix table) is. You can't calculate RI from a price-time matrix.....if you don't know what ...

What does the sentence before that say?

One last offer……..anyone? Is there anyone else, interested in understanding how RI/QC is calculated who needs help understanding each step? I can't go over each step with you people, if you won't post the instructions your using ……… How do you know ...

Not if you followed the instructions.....what you posted is a description of a result (an example), not the calculation used to get to that result . what you posted are the results of RI.......not an instruction to calculate it......... I get ...