- Search Forex Factory
- 194 Results (3 Threads, 191 Replies)
- LightKeeper replied Jul 28, 2008
Try changing this: if(Close[1]<sma2){okbuy=1;} if(Close[1]>sma2){oksell=1;} To this: if(Close[1]<sma2){oksell=1;} if(Close[1]>sma2){okbuy=1;} Having said that, this seems to be a very simple MA-based EA and..... well you know.......
- LightKeeper replied Jul 28, 2008
Hello That's easy enough. I'll have a crack at it and won't charge a dime. Just one question: what do you want it to do with these values? Regards Lighty
- LightKeeper replied Jul 3, 2008
I understand you are suggesting taking both long and short trades on EU and UC at the same time. In other words, ending up initially with 4 positions: Long EU and UC Short EU and UC With all due respect I see absolutely no logic in opening two ...
- LightKeeper replied Jun 13, 2008
.....and yet the least honest :x
- LightKeeper replied Jan 8, 2008
Richard, Thanks for that explanation, now it makes more sense. So really this is just a breakout/straddle system. I don't know if I like the 3min chart idea. MT4 doesn't even have that timeframe. But again, breakouts work on all timeframes and if ...
- LightKeeper replied Jan 7, 2008
hmm — Ok. I can't say what I think because I know absolutely nothing about it. Or are the rules of the game that we are to stare at those two charts and try to reverse-engineer the method behind it? Are you willing to tell us a little tiny bit ...
- LightKeeper replied Dec 27, 2007
That's a valid point. Price very often hits the same level twice (or more) only to bounce off. Just look at any decent consolidation. In those situations, we would have a trigger every single time because the high/low is invariably higher/lower (as ...
- LightKeeper replied Oct 27, 2006
Hi It's possible but why not just use a trailing stop within mt4?
- LightKeeper replied Oct 27, 2006
Why the hedge though?
- LightKeeper replied Oct 26, 2006
Yves, Great idea! We should also include targets 2 and 3 because the pure Mouteki target is the most aggressive. Oh wait, maybe those targets should be included in the alerts first Will include them
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Alden, I don't fully understand the SL principle (maybe due to lack of sleep last night). 10 pips above what?
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Well that's cos I'm a lawyer and know wittle bittle about intellectual property
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Hehehe But there's a reason I didn't want it to change the entire line....If you use candles and you color the entire line, when you zoom out you can't distinguish between the body and the shadow
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
LOL you're suffering from the Coder Syndrome.....me too I don't think he was asking for a code. I think he's just talking about the platform itself
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
He wants it between the hours 7 and 12
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Oh, you just want a machine to answer the ultimate question of life, the universe and everything
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
eeeeeeeehhhhh Something about this editor...keeps swallowing my codes. Trying again, just in english..... if mylow is less than low of mybarcounter then mylow equals low of mybarcounter there
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Don't know where that second "if line" went but it's not in my post! Here comes: if(MyLow<Low[MyBarCounted]){MyLow=Low[MyBarCounted];} (second set of brackets is optional as you know but I always use them to save me a headache in the future if I add ...
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
Yup, that should work I wasn't being critical, in fact didnt even know that code was posted by you. Just made an observation because I imagine that will be the next question.
- LightKeeper replied Oct 19, 2006
What's a proprietary system??? What protects that? (I'm only teasing but please DO tell me!) As for your question..... why not do run through all the bars from (Bars-IndicatorCounted) to 0, set a switch On (eg a bool called Switch) when ...