Now you ask, that stuff would probably make a whole lot more sense than about 90% of the crap that’s posted here …

Only because you’re being fed gross misinformation about it, in this thread (as many people are, about a wide range of specific points, by a few members here who know very little and understand even less, but still want to try to sound as if they ...

The correlation is inverse, not direct (but I think that’s what you meant, really, and if so you’re entirely correct ). This (like so much else you've posted) is just nonsense.

OMG the ignorance is absolutely breathtaking. This one is on a par with the way he thought the MFF case must be criminal proceedings (because he didn’t understand that civil law/courts and criminal law/courts are two totally different things) and ...

Yes, you can indeed. It was a recent addition, at the last platform update.

That’s correct (and you can actually get as many separate 14-day free trials as you want, that way, just by giving a different email address each time - but you can't "extend" the 14 days that way: you have to end one free trial and start another).

Because it’s an affiliate-link-farm site?

There’s nothing to “reconcile”. There would be something to reconcile if you were looking at two different prices for the same product. But you’re not: you’re looking at two different products. No disrespect intended, but your misunderstanding ...

Might that be because you obviously don’t have any answer to it at all? Exactly as Karl rightly mentioned above: it’s never been easier than it is now to raise huge amounts through prop-firms, and just in the time this thread’s been running, you ...

Everyone using an “R” of 3+ believes that. The problem tends to be that a win-rate as low as those produced by methods with an “R” of 3+ need a huge sample-size to be able to measure reliably what the win-rate actually is, so people don’t really ...

Is it the swing that used to belong to that Prince I keep getting emails from? His grasp of arithmetic, logic and credibility are similar to yours.

Nothing. Everything you said is correct. You’re not missing anything: you’re just rational and not living in a dreamworld like some others here. Darwin’s entire business model is extremely good for them. Not so much for us, though.

There isn’t a “one size fits all” answer: it’s personal preference and a question of which one’s rules and parameters best suit an individual’s trading style. The three best, most honest, most reliable ones are probably Topstep, Tradeday and ...

Would you perhaps think that, too, if you were putting up your capital to fund traders on the basis of their evaluation procedures? (I would.)

It’s terribly easy to get round that one: every time you do a 1-lot scalp, you just follow it up with a 0.01-lot trade which is held open for 65 seconds. (Not that I would touch Blueberry with a barge-pole, myself: they’re out-and-out fraudsters.)

This is exactly right (but not what some members here like being told).

You keep on and on and on going from thread to thread, saying this. We can all see that you’re an incentivized promoter of a rebate service, but your posts are really beginning to be too obviously spammy, now. Honestly, I’d give it a rest, if I were ...

It’s effectively the same thing, isn’t it? Surely you can see that if I’m allowed to trade CFDs and you’re not, and you say to me, “Trade this CFD for me, I’m not allowed to trade them, but I’ll advise you, and you can keep a little share of the ...

Did Karl post? I’m sure that’s what Crypto means to say, yes - and maybe he even imagines it’s true. But it isn’t true (as others are now rightly mentioning and explaining, just above). Then again, the words “Sorry, I may have been wrong there” are ...

Just nonsense. Of course there’s a leveraged spot forex market. It’s all over the place. There’s no properly regulated high-leverage spot forex market, though, because proper regulators don’t allow high leverage - which was maybe what I actually ...