- Search Forex Factory
- disker23 commented Jun 22, 2017
LOL--- it's not accidental that the ECB Economic disaster run from the top by Germany with Draghi as their parrot is involved. German banks are in trouble and have been for quite some time. This is a MASSIVE amount of manipulation that caused this ...
- disker23 replied Jun 20, 2017
url (Watch all of these)--- and watch all the videos here, and then buy the Jigsaw trading DOM. url . Trading is ALL about orderflow and volume. Price only changes AFTER volume comes into the market. IF volume, THEN price. Learn how to read ...
- disker23 replied May 31, 2017
I was in that oil trade, took over 120 ticks out, but I was reading orderflow and not looking at a chart so I saw it before your useless candlesticks. gg etc
- disker23 replied May 2, 2017
That might be the dumbest thing i've ever seen posted on this forum, and that's saying quite a lot. It's ALWAYS been the same, and if it DID change, the market wouldn't be able to function like the two sided auction it is. Here are the facts. Over ...
- disker23 replied Apr 30, 2017
oh god it hurts
- disker23 replied Apr 30, 2017
its more like 99%, including this entire forum, and excluding myself a possibly a few others. Why Do traders lose? #1--They don't speak the language necessary to understand the market, (no idea how the game is played)--#2--No Discipline, #3 Think ...
- disker23 replied Mar 5, 2017
*pulls hair out and screams loudly*
- disker23 replied Feb 9, 2017
That's a no noise system, every line on thee has extremely important information (as they are derived from VOLUME), would you believe that purple line was the highest area of volume, and the game was over for buyers as soon as it broke below it?? ...
- disker23 replied Feb 9, 2017
95 tick winner on the pound, 190 ticks actually as it's a two lot. Wish I had pictures of my 243 tick winner when Carney spoke the other day. Not bragging, curious where you got that assumption tho. If true, I might be the best trader in the world, ...
- disker23 replied Feb 7, 2017
sounds bulletproof
- disker23 replied Feb 6, 2017
Wait, wait. Your target profit is 3%, and you're risking 10%???
- disker23 replied Feb 5, 2017
I can't avoid this, so i'll be honest. You're making this MUCH more complicated than it needs to be, but that's probably because you'e never had the experiences necessary to show you how the market really works. Listen to me, octaes are fascinating, ...
- disker23 replied Feb 4, 2017
You don't create a noise free system my adding more and more indicators, which are all derivative and absolutely useless. You do it by adding small filters, and using those filters to understand market structure, the language of the market. ...
- disker23 replied Feb 3, 2017
more pound accumulating based solely on reading my DOM. <3
- disker23 replied Feb 3, 2017
I'm speaking only in regards to futures, or a regulated exchange. Forex 'Volume' is a complete joke, and they have both server and client side access to your machine so they create a synthetic market for you which in reality, isn't even the real FX ...
- disker23 replied Jan 20, 2017
It SHOULD be obvious to everyone, but 99% have no idea what they are doing hence the + 90% fail rate. It's not only that, its the key realization that winning means nothing, and Loses mean everything. Anyone can click a mouse, but controlling the ...
- disker23 replied Jan 20, 2017
ALL ABOUT RISK TO PROBABILITY, NOT RISK TO REWARD. LOSES ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN WINS, But that's just the successful 1% who happen to be professionals like me. This screenshot is of me accumulating the pound this morning, and my day is now over. ...
- disker23 replied Jan 18, 2017
Hmm my posts were deleted. Anyway: It's NOT about Risk To Reward, It's about Risk To Probability. Loses are more important that 'suspected' gains as it's all based on context. ALL about managing Risk, and that's in the professional world. ./Thread. ...