Let The Money and The Fools Talk This will be my last post for at least 90 days, could be longer... Till then, I will let the money and the fools talk... I have loaded up a live trade explorer... No you can't see my size (It's a 5 figure starting ...

You logic is so childish it's hilarious! "Daddy won't give me what I want... Therefore daddy doesn't have what I want because I always get what I want!" Grow up you fucking baby...

I could send you a check each week giving you a cut of the profit I make and it still wouldn't be enough proof for a bum like yourself who sits like a baby bird waiting for people to vomit success into his mouth...

Yea that is correct, you can also stack when the first order is in drawdown so then your second orders tp would be moves to the first orders instead of the other way around mentioned in your post.

you can boost a system that is just under break even or at break even, it’s just you can easily burn yourself in doing so and you need significantly more resources, occurrences and time in order to do so. the main reason being, a 0.1% edge vs a ...

i know it seems like that would be the case, but because the count of wins and losses will folllow a geometric Brownian motion themselves(along with price) it is extreme rare that after 100 trades the losses and wins will equal each other. That is ...

Boosting Win Rate Through Management ***WARNING: TRADE MANAGEMENT CAN BE DANGERIOUS IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING*** ***DO NOT ATTEMPT ANY CRAZY/SIGNIFICANT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES UNTIL YOU ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THE SYSTEM*** ***BELOW IS ...

I have waved back and forth on this issue as my knowledge and experience in trading has grown. I agree with you regarding the emotional aspect and what you mentioned in regards to consistent application of the system. As I first started getting into ...

I would only trade one pair at any given time. either EU or UJ since they will have the lowest spreads. How much you stack is up to you.

There is nothing special in the periods of the MA. The point was to use the most popular settings, but instead we use them in a scientific way based on data. The cycle numbers will look similar for any periods remotely close to the ones mentioned in ...

1:1 leverage per order is about 0.3% risk for each order that takes a 36 pip loss. So 3 full stop losses in a row is 1%. If you stack properly, you can make up the lost pips on the next 2-3 moves easy. The fluctuations are supposed to be small so ...

You can stack into the same position, or stack into a new one based on a different ma and different cycle. The stacking is mainly done to increase your edge. I am going to do a post outlining what I mean by this and how MM and boost your edge once ...

Use the ma cycle data to fade those up cycles on the 10 ma outlined in your image. On average each of those up cycles will be <=4 candles.

Looking pretty comfy there! Sometimes lol It is pretty hard for me not to look at anything and everything from a numbers perspective. Maybe it's my way of feeling a sense of control in an uncontrollable world.

Thanks for translating those posts! I will link this on the front page.

I am fascinated with the probabilities, and I also have doubts about certain aspects of the Gambler's fallacy and trading. For fun, here are the probabilities of getting an excess of x heads in a sample of y flips. Nothing special, but just ...

Very nice! Bagged your pips and now I see you playing some PUBG. I can dig it... Exactly sir! Glad you find it all useful! Understanding how the numbers play out on a large scale is a major key to building conviction in what you are doing.

Probability of Profit in a Series *New trader gets a hold of a profitable system. Takes 500 trades over a few weeks or months. Still loses* In this last post, we looked at how our equity curve is likely to progress using a pretty good system. That ...