Has Mr Angry gone yet??!! I don't like the recovery from 1.2825 and I've just noted an alternative that retains the count I have but within Wave -a- of Wave -iii-... The 1.2825 low was actually a 176.4% projection of the first ABC move lower from ...

You appear quite confused. I've not mentioned 1.2855. I wrote above: "It's looking like the 1.2810-25 area will support for a reversal back to 1.2930-40 and will need to be in 5-waves." I suggest you look at the chart at the top of this page and at ...

That wouldn't be a problem - I was looking at a 66.7% retracement in Wave -b- at 1.2941... but up to 1.2950-55 wouldn't break the bearish structure...

It's looking like the 1.2810-25 area will support for a reversal back to 1.2930-40 and will need to be in 5-waves. Below 1.2800 will imply the Wave -v- target estimates mentioned earlier.

Please read an earlier post in which I have defined the range. For a Wave -v- there is no such thing as an "exact" target.

This is what I have. However, it's a complicated structure. I'm still not 100% comfortable with the first ABC in particular. Use of indicators and patterns will be important in establishing this count as correct. One point I'd also like to point out ...

Exactly the way it should be taken...

skyhok As far as I know, I have only questioned - maybe challenged is another word - but only because I couldn't understand how some features of the (IIRC) New EW that has these running corrections which I had never seen so prolifically in counts ...

skyhok Just to clarify, are you saying that you're allowed to use traditional EW, New EW and NeoWave but want to ban HEW?

There's a few more I've learned as I've used it. I'm in the process of writing book 3 - just getting in touch with the publisher now. I'm adding these (few) additional tips to the book. If you've ever seen my first book "Integrated Technical ...

Not impossible but given the comments about how Wave v can be stubby best be aware. The 1.2775 target is the 38.2% projection in Wave -v-, the 41.4% at 1.2757. The 1.2708 being the 50% However, ever since the 1.3993 high the natural target has been ...

No, that's something I've found out over the years I have been using HEW. I hate those stubby Wave v's... Most are around 50% or more. The U.S. Indices love mini Wave v's...

No, you haven't measured. It is three wave - but not the way you think. And what does an initial 3-wave move risk?

Not in HEW. An expanded flat will only extend around 38.2% of the first correction - at most 41.4% in EUR... In less liquid currencies & equities I'd allow for 50% - but no more. Hence your "guessing" on the a / b in the Wave -iv-. In HEW you have ...

Currently 4-hour & hourly momentum are bearish which does not provide a safe entry. We'll have to see how it progresses. Daily momentum has begun to develop a small bullish divergence but I wouldn't trust it unless hourly & 4-hour also develop ...

It has a range and will need to be judged when Wave -c- develops. However, broadly the 1.2744-75 area is my favoured target... However a deeper one is around 1.2708.

This is the count I have been following for some while, not one I have just "invented" Trade set up - not ready yet ... Soon...

skyhok Take this with a pinch of salt but I took your EURUSD decline and below shows how HEW handled it. The 1.3332 low was the end of the first 5-wave decline - so Wave (a) and the Wave (b) a paltry 14.6%. From there please see the Wave (c) ...

Good comments AE! It does help to understand the fine details of HEW to get a stronger understanding of the even small moves that can ruin a count or imply an alternative. Having done this for 4 years now I find this invaluable.

Infinitus There is a HEW thread. At present there's a guy doing the FTSE and DAX. Unfortunately I don't follow them at all. However, do feel free to pop your head around the door! However, I agree, since I first came on here I've found the analysis ...