Even if that's the case, Darwinex ATTEMPTS to award the good traders that stick around for a while while trying not to award the bad ones who were only lucky. That's what "giving incentive" actually means. Even if the good traders aren't biting so ...

Sorry, not sure. I'd ask support ([email protected]) Each main account can have many trading accounts but the base currencies are always the same as the main account as far as I can tell.

By that logic any broker that has ever held a contest, given rebates or a deposit bonus, placed an ad or done any other marketing is a scam. Darwinex seeks and (provides incentives to) real long term alpha providing traders while other brokers seek ...

I don't blame your pessimistic view of social trading for which your warnings fit most all of them in general, however.... Darwinex is arguably not even in that category. Here's the original vision: url "Unlike copy trading platforms in the Forex ...

url Most brokers go after traders likely to lose fast and give incentives for them to do so. Darwinex goes after traders who will hopefully trade long-term and hopefully provide some long-term alpha to their investors and give incentives for them ...

Furthest thing from that in the industry. Extraordinarily transparent company. Recent partnering with Interactive Brokers: url

You need to publish your account as a Darwin if you want it to be one otherwise, it's a private trading account.

Update from support they mistakenly declined my original withdrawal request and are sending it now by wire.

Yes, unfortunately the only email that didn't wind up in spam (using a gmail account) was the one that came 24 hours before! I am now in a panic as my withdrawal request was declined. The only explanation given was: "According to withdrawal rules, ...

Hello, Canadian customer of Tickmill since being transferred in from Armada Markets in 2015 January. I've received an email today stating I need to close my accounts by tomorrow. I understand that the unfavorable regulations imposed by Canada are ...

Resolving reply from support finally.... Apparently there is a max slippage for market entry orders on an ECN account, although, if so, why not give us control via the slip variable?:

According to their support, they treat SL of an open position differently and I'm told it would have been filled if it were a SL. So, is it standard ECN behavior to treat SL different than a stop entry during low liquidity? To me it seem like ...

Can someone with some ECN knowledge tell me if this is standard ECN behavior? By ECN standards, shouldn't my order have been turned in to a market order and filled ASAP (all be it with a lot of possible slippage)? What if I was in a trade and it ...

It seems if you click on the first link first then the second link will still have the filter so you may have to manually remove the filter to see all the trades of all the PAM bots. Click 'filter' in the top right on the fxblue page and reset it. ...

exactly my point. expectancy is same (as long as both systems use same average bet size) and variance and draw-down is lower on the static bet size (non martingale) system

Does a profit dollar have less value than a start account dollar? If no then why are you risking it differently? If you want the best risk (expected average dd) versus reward (expectancy) then doubling on a winner is incorrect (Although way way way ...

I don't have 10 years or anywhere near it but a decent sample size none the less. This EA is j16 based. Real account. *I am not affiliated with the j16 group in any way. url EDIT: More info: I was a paying member of the j16 group for a few months ...