-Agreed. No reason to do this unless they are forced to. And if that happens, we would likely see many firms 'relocating'. These firms likely do not even need to place real trades in most cases. And even if they wanted to, they would not need good ...

I am not making any suggestions about you. Maybe you could pass the challenges if you were willing to change your approach. Not sure what you are going on about, really. To be clear, I am speaking in general terms when I talk about throwing away ...

-Maybe. But I suspect that some of them will eventually try to learn how to trade if they want it badly enough and are tired of losing. And if that is true, then the risk of getting black-listed may not be worth it. The reason that trading ...

-The risk of getting black-listed is extremely high, especially since they are likely using an EA across multiple accounts, simultaneously, in order to pass people. Honestly, what they are offering is irresponsible.

-Hired a service? No. Pass my own challenges? Yes. But I am not interested in your offer. Sorry.

-Yes, of course. This is why I say that I do not think that it is worth it. As far as the guarantee, they say that they will refund you if their EA fails to pass. It is a US-based company lead by marketers that also sell a bunch of other things, ...

-Yes. I think that there is probably a lot of gambling going on with newbie traders swinging for the fences. I saw a program the other day offering a done-for-you (challenges) service with a guarantee attached to it, or your money back (including ...

I just noticed that theproptrading allows unlimited funding capital (with merging up to 500K for each account) so long as the accounts are traded separately. I do not know if they are any good since I have not been following anything on them, but ...

No arguing here. I would think that anyone that is treating this as a serious business would be keen to understand various aspects of the business and stay informed on what is going on as well as what could happen in the future etc.. It is normal, ...

-Yes to both of these comments. Not only alternative revenue streams, but the possibility that these firms have set aside a healthy insurance fund to cover any significant losses/payouts as they continue to accumulate massive profits ...

-Gross. Coinbase continues to fold. -I suspect that brokers are similar for other reasons. But regarding prop firms, my hope would be that the space continues to grow and bring with it, new competition and better offerings. Even if most firms offer ...

-These days, I find myself weighing the idea of employing both strategies; having stable accounts for generating consistent income through reasonable trading, but also having a few side accounts to go heavy on, all through a totally separate firm. I ...

-Yeah, I know. I just do not like it when people are negative to others for no good reason, especially when they are like bullies.

-From my understanding, as these firms grow, there is little need for outside investors. I also think that most, larger investors may usually steer clear of such higher-risk investments unless there was some sort of insurance fund set up to cover ...

-Why would that matter to you?

-Royal challenge: No lot size limits EA's are enabled Lower profit target of 8% Holding over the weekend is allowed Daily draw-down is calculated with equity and balance 200K challenge costs $939 USD. I asked support about maximum funding allocation ...

-Not really interested in this firm, but I checked with support on this for those that may be. Per their support:

-I would want to make sure that the 4% requirement is only a one-time thing. Per their FAQ, it is not clearly defined enough in my opinion. Since that 4% profit requirement is likely based on account size and not draw-down allowance, then it is ...

-Not sure which rules you are referring to, but I suppose that it does not really matter. It is not important that we all agree on this point. I am a responsible trader and I accept the terms as they are. I just think that their 50% policy is not ...

-Posts like this should not be allowed here. -You do not have to be all-in in order to violate draw-down. I do not trade this way, but I know that it is possible. But maybe the problem is that this term all-in could be a little bit ambiguous: 2) You ...