- Search Forex Factory
- 77 Results (1 Thread , 76 Replies )
- zunk replied Aug 16, 2007
=) I know they are there but I don't think 90/30/100 will do every pair so somekind of ideas on that one would be awesome. I'm still working (slowly) on testing the ATR and different settings. This is a very good idea, Trailing Stops. Kudos to that! ...
- zunk replied Aug 16, 2007
Hello there... The Thing: It would be great if you could post some ideas on TP and maybe SL. I don't think it's SIMPLE not to have any, not complaining here, just saying out loud.
- zunk replied Aug 15, 2007
There are none yet. We are waiting for IndyCash (no stress man, you've done a great job so far!!!!) to finish up his tool som we can backtest for optimal entries for every pair. But if you go back and look you'll see that the original rules atleast ...
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
It's soo hard while this guy's doing this... I will have read only on this thread for a while... No more posting for me.. Will see if I can cool down and Then maybe IndyCash has fixed his tool also. See you
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
Excellent! I encourage you to post your reports when IndyCash has fixed the tool = so your reports can be based on something that matters. =)
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
Hehe. This guy must be pulling my leg, right?
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
God.. What are you on man? EDIT: YOU CAN'T GET TP AND SL LEVELS BY EXPERIMENTING WITH ANOTHER SYSTEM. GODDAMN MAN!!!
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
An indicator such as mine makes it easier to backtest. I'm all with you in what you're saying but as far as I know we don't have TP or SL levels. The original rules doesn't suit all pairs and the ATR hasn't been fully experimented with yet. We need ...
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
Yes =) I got you. I new version of my basic indicator: Now the ATR number is shown above/below the arrow (on more volitale pairs the number may be "under" the arrow but I don't know how to solve this. I've put the number like 20 pips above the ...
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
It was meant as a response to johnedoe's result posting. He's posts are based on the rules i wrote there. since they're incorrect the results he'd posted shouldn't be taken seriously. And what you wrote is excatly what I wrote in my 2nd last post
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
Hehe, I think we/I have already pointed out that the trades are made 24 hours after the entry is confirmed. But that's just one of the problems. number 2 is that it takes different amounts of trades depending on the SL, TP1 and TP2 amount. I haven't ...
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
IndyCash not trying to stress you here or anything, take your time! Don't look at this until monday! =) Results for pair: EURJPY Period: Aug 2006 - Jul 2007 Daily Start Time: 15:00:00 gmt TP1: 40 TP2: 90 SL: 90 Total Confirmed Signals: 15 Winners: ...
- zunk replied Aug 12, 2007
No no! That's not what I meant, it was super that you posted it. Now we can help you find what needs to be fixed, do some beta testing =) If you don't "work" on sundays then don't! We're just glad you're doing this in whatever pace you see fit. ...
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
I can't really say I agree. But ok. As you say, fair enough. See you =)
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
Yes but why should the tool take more or less TRADES based on what TP you set? It's severly flawed at the moment. We must wait til IndyCash fix it. And then, I'm all for posting the results just as you've done recently
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
I don't know what GMT oanda is on but if I choose the correct GMT and compares it to my brooker it's 24 hours off. And statement 2 above. There is no way we can consider the results of the tool relevant just based on that alone. We can just not be ...
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
Yes it's irrelevant - because the trades the tool takes are mot taken correctly! The tool is taking THE WRONG trades. The entries are not based on the setups we discuss in this thread. I'm sorry. But that's the truth. IndyCash is probably working to ...
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
Yes I understand what you're posting. If this is from the tool IndyCash is Developing then I must agree, Yes this is totaly irrelevant. I mean, why are you doing it? Do you want me to also post make-believe results that I just make up from my mind? ...
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
Yes, also notice I don't find the tool irrelevant but johnedoe's posts. hehe
- zunk replied Aug 11, 2007
Please also note that you get different amount of signals 16 vs 19. why? because atm the tool is flawed. I beleive IndyCash is working on that. S please stop =)