- Search Forex Factory
- 50 Results (1 Thread , 49 Replies )
- olpip replied Apr 25, 2016
No worries at all Alfonso, thank you for confirming. olpip
- olpip replied Apr 25, 2016
Thanks Alfonso, I've read the rules and that's why I'm asking the question At least as I read this chart, it seems that the second leg of the second peak (right-hand red arrow) is indeed lower - if only by a small amount - than the second leg of ...
- olpip replied Apr 25, 2016
Hi Alfonso Thanks for this post. A quick question if it's ok: why is the candlestick I've circled not considered a "peak"? image I wasn't sure whether the strong bullish outside bar three candles later (which included the lower low that ...
- olpip replied Mar 26, 2015
The only way they can do this is to have the client transfer to ETX their rights in whatever funds are expected to be due via the FSCS or KPMG, and then advance that amount of money to the client in a new ETX account. If they put no restrictions on ...
- olpip replied Mar 26, 2015
Oops, you posted this while I was typing. I agree completely! op
- olpip replied Mar 26, 2015
I'm not sure that this development makes much practical difference to most of us. It looks like we'll be given the option of transferring into ETX any funds we'd have been due from KPMG or the FSCS. There's nothing to suggest that ETX's involvement ...
- olpip replied Mar 10, 2015
If you had less than £50k and didn't trade (or have an open trade) on 15 Jan, in my opinion there's nothing to be gained by voting. In theory, there may be a reason for voting if you had less than £50k but traded (or were in a trade) on 15 Jan, but ...
- olpip replied Mar 9, 2015
The FSCS did not say that "Clients who deposited more than that will lose the additional amount". I assume this is just bad reporting by Forex Magnates of the currently understood facts. I suspect they meant to say that the FSCS will not refund ...
- olpip replied Mar 9, 2015
Respectfully, this is just a news article that adds nothing to what's been discussed to date. It isn't even accurate, given that there's no evidence (yet!) to support this statement: "Clients who deposited more than that will lose the additional ...
- olpip replied Mar 8, 2015
What do you mean "vote the opposite"? The upcoming meeting has nothing to do with the question of whether individuals can or must claim via KPMG or the FSCS. As a client, you are entitled to choose how you claim, and no-one else can force you to ...
- olpip replied Mar 6, 2015
What "trap" do you think KPMG would be trying to spring? In the end it makes no difference at all to them whether you claim via the FSCS or via KPMG. If you had less than £50k with Alpari, and were not in a trade on 15 January, the amount of money ...
- olpip replied Mar 4, 2015
If you have less than 50k, you will get it all back eventually, one way or the other. If you have more than 50k, then you'll get the first 50k back in full, and the rest pro-rata. If there's sufficient cash, you should get it all back, but this is ...
- olpip replied Mar 4, 2015
Or more accurately KPMG (including olpip's opinion): Q. Does Alpari (UK) Limited have a client money deficit? Alpari (UK) Limited does not presently have a client money deficit, however the special administrators are billing as much as possible, and ...
- olpip replied Mar 4, 2015
I agree with every word of that. I'm less sure that arguing about their fees as a retail client will be productive. The creditors who are not covered by the FSCS are the ones who need to argue about this if they're unhappy, since KPMG's fees are ...
- olpip replied Mar 4, 2015
The reason it'll be quicker to claim via the FSCS than via KPMG is that you only need to do one transaction with the FSCS, rather than a KPMG transaction followed by an FSCS transaction. It seems that there are insufficient funds to pay out the full ...
- olpip replied Jun 21, 2013
I only go up to about three pairs at a time, manually. This is because most of the time there's a dominant currency or two whose behaviour is giving you most of the returns. An example would be JPY or AUD lately - I don't see any reason to have ...
- olpip replied Jun 20, 2013
That's pretty much it right there! 100pips, thanks again for your time and effort. I'm sorry this thread has become so animated of late. Everyone, let's calm down and try to focus on making positive contributions. I'm sure 100pips doesn't mind ...
- olpip replied Jun 19, 2013
A friendly word: you seriously need to spend some more time reading this thread before committing money. The preferred pairs have been discussed by 100pips more than once, including as recently as the last few days. EUR/USD, for example, is ...
- olpip replied Jun 13, 2013
100pips, many thanks for everything you've contributed to this thread. Such a clean and simple system is a revelation. A quick question about SL & TP targets: have you worked these out on a long-term empirical basis, or do you base them on something ...
- olpip replied Jun 13, 2013
Just dropping in to say hi and thanks for this thread. I've dabbled in forex for the last few years, but despite some success, I've struggled to find the time to trade enough to make it worth my while. My favourite approach involves London ...