- Search Forex Factory
- 76 Results
- esquire replied Jan 20, 2012
Just had some brainstorming about the leading/lagging part: Either the lagging vs. leading is 'momentarly' (meaning the brokers are more or less leading or lagging the same amount, but all of a sudden one becomes much more leading), or one is ...
- esquire replied Jan 18, 2012
Keeping one eye on this thread. Maybe it's already noticed, but have a look over here: url Guy claims that modifieing an order every 28 seconds will keep the connection with mt4 open and thereby a trade will be executed 0.5 seconds longer. Might ...
- esquire replied Nov 15, 2011
This one doesn't seem profitable to me at all. Even after removing the martingale, which clearly is not going to improve the system at all, it's still pretty much down all the way. The main problem i think is, like almost all single based ...
- esquire replied Nov 11, 2011
leerees just informed me about the replies in this topic. First of all, nice work PipMeUp! Have to say I dont know a lot about Gaussian functions or that i'm a very good programmer - your results already beat me - but your stuff looks really ...
- esquire replied Oct 30, 2011
Do bear in mind that this indi paints different live then dropping it on a history chart. Makes a difference of 2/3 bars every time
- esquire replied Sep 21, 2011
Consider this with the compounding: You can only lose 4 trades after each other, after that your broke. Let's say the chance that you lose a trade is 60% (just guessing here), the odds that you will go broke is 0.6^4 = 12,9 %. Which is waaaaay to ...
- esquire replied Sep 10, 2011
Best way (and only as far as i know) is to look at the deposits/widraws. Widraws often means it's a live account (although not always), as it doesnt really makes sense to widraw demo cash. And sometimes deposits has some comment about demo money.
- esquire replied Sep 5, 2011
Hmm, bring that over here please, it's still rainy and cold as snow.
- esquire replied Sep 4, 2011
Check this short calculation i made with some random numbers (attachment), all adds up to one (so it should be correct). Also see how the underlying differences are about the same (on the left, 0.57 is more or less double of 0.30, on the right ...
- esquire replied Sep 4, 2011
Invert the numbers by dividing 1 through the numbers, after that do the same math. 1/150 = 0,00666666667 = 47% 1/200 = 0,005 = 35.29% 1/400 = 0,0025 = 17.6% (numbers more or less) Hope that helps, Cheers
- esquire replied Aug 24, 2011
I've been monitoring it lately, and found some weird bug. Although I can't find it in the code, trades almost never close when the bar opens & closes at the wrong side of the bar.. Anybody got the same error?
- esquire replied Aug 20, 2011
Steve, i made this indicator that at the begin of the bar, will calculate where the price will hit the ma. Not sure if it's bugfree (weekend-can't test it now), but i think it does the trick. Hope you can find some time to implement this, i think it ...
- esquire replied Aug 20, 2011
Had some pennies left on an micro account, so started to trading this one live there. It trutly is amazing. I did test it on demo with the atr stuff, but that doesn't work out great. My theory is that, when trading manually, you pick the best trades ...
- esquire replied Aug 19, 2011
It's due to the fact that the ea keeps modifing the trade as the ma changes value - which is almost all the time. This can partly be solved by going into the code and change "sleep(1000)" into something like sleep(60000) (instead of 1 sec it will ...
- esquire replied Aug 15, 2011
Dont think criminals will start complaining about that. Anyway, easy to solve, open de mql code and search for Sleep(1000);//One second And change the 1000 into something else (30000 if you want a 30 sec sleep for example) @warsteiner72 thought ...
- esquire replied Aug 11, 2011
Nope. Have to tell you that i didn't tested it fully for the last weeks, but a couple of times a run of several days, all in profit at the end. I think Sgt.forex' myfxbook tells the story however...
- esquire replied Aug 11, 2011
Got a demo running like whip's. Seems great so far, but isn't it the mpmt that does the trick? The trades aren't remarkably special, it's the 0.3 hedge that makes the bot profitable. Untill a certain point i guess, untill one of the hedges starts to ...
- esquire replied Aug 11, 2011
It's the one from this post: url The other ones are sending the same trade multiple times. However steve changed something that stopped the bot from working, so i modded it a bit (see attached). That should work. I use tp = 30 btw. Note: just ...
- esquire replied Aug 11, 2011
Same here, OOTB, force yourself not to look for one day and BAM!: profit Also like the fact - in contrast with steve's other profitable ea's, that this one uses a stoploss and thereby doesn't force you into a moment where you have to decide ...
- esquire replied Aug 11, 2011
I guess, never had the feeling anyway Thanks steve and ibuk for this wonderfull simple system. It is going for non-stop profit ever since i put the ea on a chart.