![]() |
|
hharrington may be a long-time and well-respected FF member, but posting his own method AND questioning the integrity of the strategy that I am presenting offers nothing of any positive impact. Not only this, it had the additional negative impact of other members posting their requests for his indicator and template files. This only serves to distract from my one of main objectives which have been clearly outlined at the start of the thread, i.e. I am trying to get across the need for consistent focus on a single strategy, as we should all know that jumping from system to system and indicator to indicator offers absolutely no hope to anyone becoming profitable. As the thread OP I have already made it perfectly clear what I will and will not tolerate here. I don't care if my ignore list grows to 50 people; the integrity of the thread and its' direction is of paramount importance and any unwanted distractions will be weeded out as soon as possible. I don't like being the "thread Nazi", but I feel it is necessary to keep this thread on track. All that aside, I look forward to getting back on track myself from January 3rd. In the meantime, I wish you all a wonderful New Years' celebration and let's all make plenty of green pips in 2017. Peace ![]() |
|
"Having said all that however, if you honestly feel that there is a "bug" in the system somewhere, I am open to you sending me a PM and I will investigate. If I deem your suggestion will enhance the indicator or strategy in some way, I will work on it and post an update." The thread cannot become a mish mash of everyone's input where the original strategy posted is a completely different one by page 500 like I see happen in so many threads here. It's just a matter of keeping the thread clean and following direction, shoot Kirk a PM if you feel you can add something of substance I'm sure he will look in to it. |
"Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something." - Plato. |
The reason i like this system is because of its simplicity. Having tons of indicators would not increase the efficiency. The result is just simple as well - Profit, or Loss. any updates on your development kirk? |
Shaun |
|
The idea is to fully comprehend the concept and be able to extract setups visually, because Later on when Kirk release the indicator with its alerts, it will do most of the work for you but instead of following it blindly you'll be able to verify the logic of each setup. |
1 Attachment(s) |
1 Attachment(s) |
Hi All Its all gone very quiet, do you think this system is SO good the programmers run off with Kirk. |
Here is what I think...we have a comprehensive strategy here which can be traded like any other strategy, the indicator Kirk's working on is only an addition of alerts. Also, I think that Kirk and the programmer are busy coding and testing to provide us with a flawless system. Moreover, I think instead of running out of patience, it's better to start interacting with what we have in here, and last I think the awaited indicator will be worthless if we can't simply trade it without the alerts. Ok enough thinking for one day! ![]() |
![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
|
1 Attachment(s)
I am working on one template that shows all 3 settings. So far it's ok but when you have 57 indicators on one template, the CPU has a little more to do than normal. Especially when you have 9 different currencies that you are watching. Just see. ![]() |
|
1 Attachment(s)
Actually that is a great idea, but with Kirk's indicator it won't be possible because some formulas requires data from price, BB & MA. So in your example the future indicator will only show alerts for the M5, however still you'll be able to monitor the other 2 TFs without alerts. So it can be a good option. Perhaps Kirk might consider adding an optional MTF setting into the code, as in the attached mtf stoch. #MTF Stochastic v3.0.mq4 |
D. |
© Forex Factory