Gosh! first time i check my thread and there is a load of replies - nice
Ok, lets see if i can answer them as much as possible and also clarify a little as to what this thread is about.
Firstly the kind of questions i would like to be fielded are about your trading situation and not mine - for example if you are having a problem with discipline or cant seem to make it forward on timing etc etc - this is because Im not able to answer questions on my own current methods due to contractual obligations with my main client. Hope you understand this.
Right then, questions ive had so far:
John asked why i think my system failed.
The system i was referring to was called Grail and you can find a blow by blow account of my opinion why the system failed on my Grail blog here
http://grailtrading.blogspot.com/
all systems fail eventually because market conditions come along that we have never seen before in our backtesting - it's a long explaination so please read the blog for the full monty. The key is to be able to recognise when it has failed and dont assume that it wont.
Beachbum asks why i want to do this.
well beachbum I have a history of contributing to the trading community and when i got the email about the 1KT thing I thought it sounded like a good opportunity to get involved again.
Am I touting for business? not really, most people who invest in managed accounts do not hang around trading forums. There is quite a difference between a trader and an investor - I like trading for investors but don't enjoy trading for traders as they question every move, every pip - you close a trade at 300 pips and an investor is happy - a trader asks why you didnt close when it was at 450 pips.
In addition to this most of the programmes that I run or trade for are closed to new investors. I currently only have one which is still open and that is almost full also.
So in short, no i'm not touting. Can i reverse the question and ask why you applied for 1KT? and if your motives are the same as mine why would you assume without any evidence that I'm touting for business? why didnt you ask john his motives as he has a sig link also? Not very respectful really but i'll cut some slack so give me some also and time will tell.
Pluto I agree and disagree. Time has taught me that anything based on backtesting is most probably NOT going to stand the test of time. Experience has taught me that basing a system on any indicator at all is a waste of time and that a trading method should be based around global principals rather than mathematical analysis.
The global principal i use is that trends exist. I use price to then trade this principal belief. This is as far as i will go in discussion of my own methods.
Superdesign asked by PM "Just curious, looking at your statement I must admit it looks like your system is holding its own, but why do you vary so much in lot size from trade to trade? Its just I have read a few money management books and Im curious as to what your strategy is in that department."
I wont go deep into this, however my staking plan is based on an individual trade basis and a consecutive trade by pair basis.
I have a base unit size which i apply fractions to each currency based on their current volatility. EG GBPJPY is a serious mover of around 230 pips per day - my staking on this is based on around 25% of my base unit. EURGBP moves 35 pips a day and therefore if i traded this it would be multiples of my base unit.
Then there is a histroy factor on a per pair basis - my hit rate over history is relatively low at around 40% therefore if the pair I am about to trade has had a bad run I am increasing my stake slightly every time so as to make the most of the run when it does come and when it wins i reduce substantially.
add all this together with the unit vs volatility calculation and then the history staking and you get a robust system of money management.
your staking plan is the number one thing in your trading method - entries do not matter nearly as much as people think - you could toss a coin and make money if your money management is right.
So, there - first post from me, hope it was ok.
From now on please remember to ask questions on generalities rather than on my own methods
