In addition to the previous post....
If KPMG could lawfully take money from the segregated accounts to pay for costs incurred they would do it without asking us to accept it. They are only asking if we want that to be paid out of our pockets because they can't do it themselves lawfully. They can if we accept it.
For example, creditors don't have that option. By law it will come out of their share if the assets of the company are not enough to cover all creditors so they have no votes if they wanna pay for it or not.
I could be mistaken but I think this is their angle!
If KPMG could lawfully take money from the segregated accounts to pay for costs incurred they would do it without asking us to accept it. They are only asking if we want that to be paid out of our pockets because they can't do it themselves lawfully. They can if we accept it.
For example, creditors don't have that option. By law it will come out of their share if the assets of the company are not enough to cover all creditors so they have no votes if they wanna pay for it or not.
I could be mistaken but I think this is their angle!