Cheers,
k
Similarity: A Practical Approach 859 replies
Similarity Trading - The ZZBB Method 215 replies
Rainbow similarity 256 replies
Similarity Stuff 17 replies
Directional Similarity 0 replies
DislikedThis is the heart of the matter and it works on any time frame. I will prove this to you. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {quote} OK now all clear. I thought EURUSDD was saying the opposite hence my lack of understanding. Thanks. {quote} Good indicator and good insights! Right on time for new experiments with k Thanks for sharing. {quote} Looking forward it. {quote} Proposition 1 seems in conflict with the example setup (http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?p=7681717#post7681717) EURUSDD showed us, where he clearly stated k is the height of the transient zone.Ignored
Dislikedmetioned that days ago in theory there shouldnt be any TZ {quote}Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's incorrect. there will always be 2 transient prices on any pair no matter whatIgnored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} This has always intrigued me so maybe we could initiate some discussion around this to finally clear this up. I don't have a degree in mathematics or anything like that but have studied these statements. Are we really talking about two propositions? My basic understanding is that the first statement (Proposition 1) is saying that price is almost surely recurrent. So there would be k and h figures that someone could pick that would make that statement true. So in theory every price on the chart could be recurrent if we wait long enough....Ignored
Disliked{quote} {image} {quote} If any price is almost surely recurrent within price+k and price-k for the next h bars then theoretically we could enter the market at any given time (except strong trends or near confirmed transient zones). But I guess it doesn't really work that way.Ignored
Dislikedcorrect point of view but wrong result %33 is related with one on the left one on the right of TZ bar. in our case we have 10 bars untouched on the left & now we are counting the ones on the right here we need the statistics of how TZ s are broken. eg when we have 10 bars completed on the left & when we start counting on the right when TZ is broken on the 1st bar or 2nd etc.............. when we have that stat then we can talk on probability {quote}Ignored
Dislikedcorrect point of view but wrong result %33 is related with one on the left one on the right of TZ bar. in our case we have 10 bars untouched on the left & now we are counting the ones on the right here we need the statistics of how TZ s are broken. eg when we have 10 bars completed on the left & when we start counting on the right when TZ is broken on the 1st bar or 2nd etc.............. when we have that stat then we can talk on probability {quote}Ignored
Dislikedin our case we have 10 bars untouched on the left & now we are counting the ones on the right here we need the statistics of how TZ s are broken. eg when we have 10 bars completed on the left & when we start counting on the right when TZ is broken on the 1st bar or 2nd etc.............. when we have that stat then we can talk on probability {quote}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hello Leeshindig, please what are those dots on your chart ?Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think you didn't see that my chart has h_left set to 6 so not 1 bar left. It is 6 bars left and then the probability of breaking the PTZ on the next bar. For other h_left=10 and h_right=1 should be similar, haven't checked, but thanks to the indi from kprsa is it easy to find out.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think you didn't see that my chart has h_left set to 6 so not 1 bar left. It is 6 bars left and then the probability of breaking the PTZ on the next bar. For other h_left=10 and h_right=1 should be similar, haven't checked, but thanks to the indi from kprsa is it easy to find out.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for all your comments so far... It appears we are all in agreement. I just wondered as a couple of times I have heard people mention a second proposition but in my mind their is only one proposition with a definition. According to Eurusdd we only need that proposition to earn $$$ but we have to overcome times when prices are transient which normally happens when price is trending strongly.Ignored
Disliked& that is the point we need that stats after how many bars the TZ is invalidated. {quote}Ignored